It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments, such as the South pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, the development of technology makes it possible for scientists and tourists to explore remote places, such as the South pole. In my opinion this trend has negative and positive effects.
On the one hand, visiting isolated natural places could raise the knowledge of humans about the habitat. Scientists could investigate the climate, weather, geology and wildlife of unique regions. After that, they could continue to research recorded data on the laboratory. For example, if scientists had not travelled to Antarctica, they could not know the fast decrease of polar bears to have an immediate solution. Moreover, they could forecast that white bears may become extinct over the next 50 years. Meanwhile, when setting foot in untouched places, the spectacles of nature could satisfy tourists’ curiosity as well as raising their appreciation of the natural environment.
On the other hand, the appearance of human beings could impact significantly on the isolated places. Travelling activities are one of the main causes of environmental pollution and degradation. For instance, tourists often throw trash such as disposable plastic items. Unfortunately, wild animals may eat these and they could face dangerous situations. Moreover, some natural places could be modified or even destroyed to build recreational areas and hotels to serve visitors. As a result, it reduces biodiversity and puts wild animals at risk of extinction. Therefore, tourism activities bring many disadvantages for isolated areas.
In conclusion, exploring untouched places has many benefits for science and widens human horizons. However, those activities also are a detriment to the natural environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | kevann | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Lanlanlanlan | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Lanlanlanlan | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | maiduc | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that the best way to encourage children that have a healthy diet at school and some people believe that parents should teach them to have a healthy diet Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Leadership has always been playing an indispensable part in today s society the ability to make tough decisions or solve problems However therefore it has become a controversial issue for many people which makes lots of divided opinions on it Some believe 78
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 78
- Today there are plenty of opposing opinions about whether intelligent machines will gradually replace the human race in present day society Many people argue that it can generate more drawbacks when using these machines in almost all industries However I 84
- Today there are plenty of opposing opinions as to whether governments should dedicate a considerable part of their budget to reinstating run down buildings or not It is claimed that public purse should be expended on the construction of new and safer buil 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67450980392 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9718298059 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.643137254902 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2750942248 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.1176470588 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215301160047 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637137431323 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919471892896 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150592669289 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115844475273 0.056905535591 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.01 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67450980392 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9718298059 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.643137254902 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2750942248 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.1176470588 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215301160047 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637137431323 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919471892896 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150592669289 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115844475273 0.056905535591 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.01 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.