It is true to say that news editors are responsible for the content of TV news and written news.
It is true to say that news editors are responsible for the content of TV news and written news. Regarding this, it seems that there are two main reasons including owner pressure and attracting more viewers or readers which influence editors decision. Also, according to the statistics, modern people are accustomed to negative news and by my reckoning, it would be far better if we are exposed to positive news more.
It appears that there are two main factors influencing news editors in terms of selecting specific news. The first and foremost factor, perhaps, is attracting more viewers, which contribute to earning more money and gaining more reputation. As a case in point, Iranian news, irrespective of their media, normally broadcast 75% negative news in order to absorb more audience. Secondly, it is quite possible that the owners have special political views and consequently their views affect news editors decision regarding what to broadcast or print on TV or in newspapers respectively.
Psychologically, human tends to pay more attention to bad news than positive news. News editors are informed about this fact and as a result, they broadcast more negative news. This lead to the fact that viewers or readers are exposed to far more negative news and become accustomed to it in the long run. For example, the general public in my country tends to pay more attention to bad news, approximately 40%, than positive news. This lead to becoming cynical in the long-time. Therefore, it would be far better if more good news was reported.
To sum up, it is crystal clear that owners attitude and earning more money are the main factors impacting news editors in terms of the type of news to select. In addition, it is obvious that citizens tend to listen or read more bad news and become used to it, and it would be quite better if more promising news was reported.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-23 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 61 | view |
- The charts compare the volume of water utilized for the industry, agriculture, and houses in six various locations around the globe. 78
- The figures demonstrate the global water proportion utilized in three sectors per km3 over the course of a one hundred year and various data in this regard in two nations. 89
- It is claimed that living in a foreign nation who have different language could lead to devastating social and practical problems. 56
- The illustration demonstrates the proportion of graduates unable to find an appropriate occupation in a specific European nation over the course of a two year. 78
- In the new millennium and by the advent of the internet almost every sphere of human lives has been altered in some ways. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[4]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'accustomed to negative', 'accustomed to negativing'.
Suggestion: accustomed to negative; accustomed to negativing
...ng to the statistics, modern people are accustomed to negative news and by my reckoning, it would be f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...to it in the long run. For example, the general public in my country tends to pay more attenti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'owners'' or 'owner's'?
Suggestion: owners'; owner's
...d. To sum up, it is crystal clear that owners attitude and earning more money are the...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in fact, as a result, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90282131661 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6532823509 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470219435737 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5754200887 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.266666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.500222002652 0.244688304435 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.226674308941 0.084324248473 269% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.228367498788 0.0667982634062 342% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.360796543055 0.151304729494 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121017864283 0.056905535591 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.