many countries believe that international tourism has harmful effects. Why do they think so? What can be done to change their views?
In modern days, overseas travelling has become popular. However, many people criticised that international travellers bring negative impacts on the local environment. This essay will analyse why these people have such a view and will suggest the possible way to change their view.
International tourism is often criticised for its contribution to environmental degradation and the disrespect to the traditional custom. First, many overseas travellers have been noticed of throwing rubbish on the ground and smoking in the public. These irresponsible behaviours leave tremendous white plastic for the local community to deal with, which consequently cause detrimental water, air and soil contamination. Given the above, many individuals believe there are little benefits to foreign tourism.
Second, some international tourists are insensitive and ignorant about local traditions and culture. For example, in Indonesia, many tourists wear inappropriately and expose their body too much when they visit a temple, where visitors are expected to wear long sleeves and cover their legs. Such behaviour leads to a more negative attitude towards international travellers in the local community.
Despite the above, it is undeniable that international tourism is a vital driver of stimulating the local economy for many countries. Government could promote this fact to the local people through public education. For example, government officials could illustrate how much international travellers have contributed to the local GDP and calculate how much jobs are created due to the demand for goods and services.
In conclusion, in some people’s view, international tourism does have adverse effects on the local environment. However, government could still change this view by emphasising its importance to the local economy from the tourists.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-10 | mandy.zang | 78 | view |
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since computer technology is now replacing their functions To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- Some people think that using mobile phones and computers has a negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- Some people think reading stories in books is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Students in school or university learn more from teachers than from other resources (e.g. Internet or TV), do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people say that playing computer games is bad for children in every aspect. Others say that playing computer games can have positive effects on the way children develop. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 353, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...uted to the local GDP and calculate how much jobs are created due to the demand for ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the local economy from the tourists.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, second, so, still, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82720588235 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11747146772 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584558823529 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2880312021 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174221592808 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621117056965 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466318886835 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104791480797 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275239074392 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.