Many countries import large amounts of food from other parts of the world. Is this a positive or negative development?
Importing food from abroad is a growing tendency among a significant number of nations. While there have been some potential drawbacks, I believe that the benefits are more impressive.
On the one hand, imported food tends to contain more detrimentally artificial preservatives and cause rising competition among domestic and international businesses. First of all, as food importing from a different country takes a much longer amount of time to reach the final destination, numerous toxic ingredients are used to deter them from rotting. As a result, these sources of food are not often fresh and nutrient-dense by the time they appear at convenience stores and supermarkets. Secondly, domestic food brands can suffer from losing their market share due to globally attractive international businesses. For example, Vinamilk, which is a Vietnamese milk brand, has been a strong competitor among cow milk products in China as a rising amount of Chinese parents love this product.
On the other hand, countless nations provide their citizens with diverse food culture concerning the wealth of imported food. People do not need to travel to far-off places to relish food delicacies because numerous national food markets nowadays offer a cross-cultural representation of gastronomy. Therefore, people have a wide range of choices in terms of tasty recipes for all seasons. For example, in Singapore, there has been a growing business trade of millions-of-dollars worth of tropical fruits such as mangoes and watermelons from Vietnam, and various livestock commodities from Australia.
In conclusion, although imported food causes some disadvantages for domestic companies and worrying artificial ingredients. From my perspective, I consider this phenomenon to be a positive development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-25 | rika205 | 61 | view |
| 2022-06-23 | rika205 | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-16 | Ngoc Trinh | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-16 | Ngoc Trinh | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-01 | minhlamnguyen1204 | 56 | view |
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on more important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Others believe that there are health benefits of living in the cities Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Many people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Others believe that there are health benefits of living in the cities Discuss both views and give your own opinion 71
- Many countries import large amounts of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 224, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'take'?
Suggestion: take
...food importing from a different country takes a much longer amount of time to reach t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62962962963 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23339060659 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644444444444 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0543008868 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.923076923 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249812665977 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835358254274 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058834995737 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145554349957 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330709198961 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.