In many countries there are not enough students are choosing to study science subjects. What are the causes? And what will be the effects on society?
It is true that in some nations, students tend to choose other subjects for learning in lieu of science. Although this trend is attributed by a whole host of reasons, some affects it can cause for society.
On the one hand, there are several reasons of this problem. The first one is that since there are many schools or colleges are behind the time, they are slow to dismiss the traditional idea that girls should not take part in science. In fact, this sexist attitude regards science as a traditional men preserve, thus many universities prefer to allow man instead of woman involved in science courses, which would decrease the opportunities of woman counterpart want to study this field. The other reason is that nowadays, there are many other fields which are more attractive than science, such as business or finance. This means that many people believe occupations in these areas could bring them more opportunities to land decent jobs with handsome salaries, or moving up the career ladder.
On the other hand, there would be serious effects on society if students do not choose to study science subjects. First, in term of environment, this problem could lead to the problem of lacking traditional professionals to find out solutions for urgent problems, such as finding the alternative sources of renewable energy when the amount of oil and coal is decrease significantly. Second, in health perspective, there will be the phenomenon of lacking doctors, which can lead to the burden in human resources of health care system, or lacking of researchers, who are key factors to find out the cure for life-threatening diseases, such as Alzheimer.
In conclusion, some causes of this problem can be identified, and the serious effects on society must not be underestimated
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-27 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-13 | Giang H Do | 56 | view |
| 2021-05-27 | dhruv j patel | 61 | view |
| 2021-05-27 | dhruv j patel | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-19 | Tynna | 89 | view |
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 73
- There is no need to complete an education beyond a primary school level Do you agree or not 67
- It has been said that people who read for pleasure have more developed imaginations and language skill than people who prefer to watch TV Do you agree or disagree 61
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 73
- In countries where there is high unemployment most pupils should be offered only primary education There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'man'?
Suggestion: man
...titude regards science as a traditional men preserve, thus many universities prefer...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reatening diseases, such as Alzheimer. In conclusion, some causes of this probl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, thus, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05762711864 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8121499431 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562711864407 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.6279368269 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.636363636 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193991265817 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791531328799 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904844819512 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12379894467 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393070361949 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'man'?
Suggestion: man
...titude regards science as a traditional men preserve, thus many universities prefer...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reatening diseases, such as Alzheimer. In conclusion, some causes of this probl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, thus, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05762711864 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8121499431 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562711864407 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.6279368269 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.636363636 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193991265817 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791531328799 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904844819512 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12379894467 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393070361949 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.