Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar. Do you agree or disagree?Do you agree or disagree?
A large quantity of health issues are caused by the consumption of sugary foodstuffs, hence, some people believe that an increase in price will contribute to a reduction in the use of those products. However, from my perspective, this idea may cause several disadvantages to the residents in many aspects.
Food or drink containing high levels of sugar still benefits people in need to a certain extent. These groups have high demands of sugar consumption to satisfy their current demands. Therefore, approaching these kinds of products will become challenging because they have to pay a higher expense, which may result in social inequality. For instance, people suffering from hypoglycemia may use sugary products as a therapy to relieve the situation, and raising the price of those can breed heavier expenditure burden on these people. Products consisting of sugar can also be a quick and ideal method to recharge the energy in a speedy way to certain individuals, especially those who are skinny or malnourished, which still account for a large part off population in some nations.
Implementing a price growth in the area of sugary products can engender the rise in sugar cost, which may also negatively affect people economically. Sugar is a vital substance in every dish and a climb in this sector can lead to inflation, which is considered enemy in most of the strategies of economies in the world. A case in point is that, when sugar cost increases, the expense people have to spend on meals also soars up, and this is a contributor to the currency devaluation.
All in all, in spite of posing certain risks to the healthiness, I am not an advocate of the idea that people render the price of sugary products more costly due to the aforementioned reasons above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-06 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-22 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-05 | MEBC Class | view | |
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process of making soft cheese Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Nowadays young people spend too much of their free time in shopping malls Some people fear that this may have negative effects on young people and the society they live in To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 78
- Nowadays young people spend too much of their free time in shopping malls Some people fear that this may have negative effects on young people and the society they live in To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 474, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...the situation, and raising the price of those can breed heavier expenditure burden on the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 623, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a speedy way" with adverb for "speedy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...and ideal method to recharge the energy in a speedy way to certain individuals, especially thos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, may, so, still, therefore, for instance, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95637583893 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88119836098 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56711409396 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3647705326 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.272727273 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229248246539 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878592528257 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447392601965 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123125351949 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388773967293 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.