Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is it the cases? What can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
It is argued that museums and places of historical significance are primarily attended by tourists than the locals. This essay aims to look at two major causes of the phenomenon and suggest possible solutions to encourage the attendance of the locals to these places.
There are a number of factors responsible for why more foreign visitors than the locals pay more visits to museums and history-related places. One of the reasons is that as newcomers to another country, visitors show a greater sense of curiosity about the local history and thus feel strongly motivated to explore these locations. It is true that foreign visitors really wish to expose the cultural heritage and war relics as well as gain an insight into the destination country while the local citizens are usually well-acquainted with the past of their nation. The second reason is that foreigners are more willing to pay the admission fees. To be more precise, many well-known historical sites do not come cheap and often need a substantial amount of entrance fee, which is more affordable for visitors from other countries than some less rich locals in developing ones.
In order to resurrect the interest of the local people in coming to museums and sites of historical importance, many courses of actions are available. One approach is to arouse the curiosity among the native people by organizing varied activities which may join art performances of famous public figures. This not only helps them feel the need to learn the historical lessons but also cultivate their sense of community and patriotism. The second measure can be that the local authorities should lower the entrance fees or offer some discounts to local residents. As a result, they will feel less burdened by their financial conditions.
In conclusion, while it is understandable why foreigners often show greater enthusiasm for museums and historic spots, proper actions can be adapted to awaken the interest of local inhabitants in those places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-25 | Vũ Thuỳ Liên | 78 | view |
- Tobacco is a kind of drug. People have been free to use it. Some people think that it should be illegal to use it comparing with other drugs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What is your opinion? 56
- In countries, people live in a big city, I’d like alone or in small family unit, rather than a large, extended family groups. Is this positive or negative trend? 67
- Nowadays in many countries women have full time job. Therefore, it is logical to share household task evenly between men and women. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- Some people say that parents should control their children’s from a very young age. Do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint. 61
- Some people think that managers alone should make decisions in the company, while others think that employees should be involved in the decision-making process too. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... performances of famous public figures. This not only helps them feel the need t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, really, second, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15692307692 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79467625757 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6842258453 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.923076923 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327407990655 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105932562508 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777061790815 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181443637278 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252926291603 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.