Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
Generally, tourists are more likely to visit museums and historical places rather than local people due to different kinds of reasons and the governments always try to attract more local people but it is a complicated problem that has been evaluated in this essay.
It is true that the tourists travel to another country in order to experience unique things that certainly one of the first options will be the museums. Indeed, the mentioned places are just related to a specified country and they cannot find them in their countries. In fact, they are not acquired enough about the other possible way when they are traveling to another country. As a result, a high percentage of tourists in historical places is logical. On the other hand, the people of each country prefer to spend their leisure time in terms of more exciting activities and they are aware of more fun and attractive ways in their countries in comparison with visiting that probably has become boring and usual for natives. For instance, the most important place which every tourist in Paris will visit is the Eifel tower while the resident of Paris always passes it indifferently.
There is some easy way to increase the rate of native visitors by introducing them through TV ads, discounts for local residents, and the construction of entertainment complexes in the neighborhood of museums to provoke families for visiting museums along with them. For example, creating an area to play with children beside the museums will help families to visit there by achieving multiple goals at the same time. One of the sophisticated solutions may be to appeal to schools to bring their pupils to historical places during learning of related subjects or as extra activities in the summer to get familiar more with their history and culture.
In conclusion, it seems the lower visiting of historical places by native people is reasonable to some extent and the governments can encourage the people by increasing their knowledge and creating other exciting facilities beside them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | thaotanya | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-28 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-20 | mbn250 | 73 | view |
- advantages and disadvantages of the use of organic foods 84
- advantages and disadvantages of the use of organic foods 84
- what do you think about technology in education what are the pores and cones 73
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- in spite of the many advances women have made in education and employment they continue to be at a disadvantage when it comes to pay and promotion in your view what should be done to promote equality of opportunity for men and women in the workplace 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04142011834 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68339770207 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53550295858 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.8225687102 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.909090909 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7272727273 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3636363636 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322509545124 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115688709875 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105328538658 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225781724491 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1064498316 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.