Many newspapers and magazines feature stories about the private life of famous people. We know what they eat, where they buy their clothes and who they love. We also often see pictures of them in private situations.
Is it appropriate for a magazine or a newspaper to give this kind of private information about people?
Exposure to the Internet combined with today’s higher standard for emotional intelligence have allowed people to revisit behaviors with problematic undertone that were considered normal in the past. For instance, the overly-invasiveness of newspapers and magazines when it comes to the lives of celebrities. In fact, every aspect of their lives are either televised or put on social media for viewers to see. However, many have suggested that this is not something our society should move forward to normalizing, and I fully agree with this notion. As such, in this essay, I will be providing my own ideas and elucidation of some popular arguments against the exploitation of celebrities’ privacy.
First, it is crucial to look into why the demand for famous people’s pictures is so high. When one idolises a person, it is only eventual that they want to know more and more about the figure they so adore. This can come as the forms of personal information, their habits, likings, personality, and of course, pictures. With respect to the said celebrity in mind, an issue would not be aroused at all, but this is obviously not the case most of the time. So, why exactly is this problematic?
It is safe to say that celebrities are no less human than your average Joe, yet many people do not seem to be able to comprehend this fact. This consequently gives rise to a division in the way famous people are perceived, as either they are met with insensible worship or out-right disregard of basic human rights. The reason for this immense disparity lies in the way the media tends to portray them as unrealistic figures, negatively or positively notwithstanding. And while some celebrities thrive on the constant attention they receive, others, understandibly, don’t appreciate hving every aspect of their life on camera. Also, in the age of social media, one can have total control over what they post and can, to a degree, manipulate how they are perceived there. This begs the question: Why can’t famous people have that same freedom and control? Such inequality is something our society needs to be working against during this day and age, not perpetuating it through dehumanzing and commercializing the well-known. Lastly, it is not hidden to the plain eyes that paparazzi are behind the majority of these celebrity pictures. Consequently, anyone with the sightest bit of common sense knows that what paparazzi do are very much illegal, so why again are we allowing them to roam this freely?
It is understandable that one is excited to know about their idols’ lives, but it should not come at the price of their privacy. As such, I further reinforce my belief that it is not appropriate for magazines and newspaper to display unprecedented pictures of celebrities for profit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-11 | hungdung2507 | 73 | view |
- Many newspapers and magazines feature stories about the private life of famous people We know what they eat where they buy their clothes and who they love We also often see pictures of them in private situations Is it appropriate for a magazine or a newsp 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. 67
- Sports which depend on violence for entertainment such as wrestling or boxing have no place in a civilized society and should be banned To what extend do you support or reject this idea 89
- Technology can be a threat to the survival of a language but it can also serve as a powerful tool to preserve even restore languages Discuss the statement and give your opinion 78
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals, others say that there are more important environmental problems.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, lastly, look, so, well, while, for instance, in fact, of course, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 24.0651302605 220% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2332.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 465.0 315.596192385 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01505376344 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93073861212 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 176.041082164 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552688172043 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 747.9 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8275030853 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.047619048 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214868364456 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593930697704 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499360020024 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133567189471 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359669571409 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.