Many people are now spending more and more time travelling to work or school. Some people believe that this is a negative development while others think there are some benefits. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The idea that spending a large amount of time commuting to work or school has its own advantages remains a source of controversy. While many people agree that this phenomenon is beneficial to some certain extent, I would argue that the downsides of it cannot be overlooked.
On the one hand, people may consider long trips to work as opportunities to enjoy themselves and the best solution to reduce the problem of urban overpopulation. In terms of contentment, when using public means of transportation such as buses or metros, citizens have more time to contemplate sceneries along the road getting to workplaces. This would help them to relieve the working pressure as well as boost their mental well-being. Regarding the issue of metropolises, although living in suburban areas or in the countryside, people have to drive a long way to their companies or school in the city, this could alleviate the demand of huge population in downtowns. In addition, when inhabiting remote areas, people can benefit from fresh air and a peaceful environment away from the hustle and bustle of life.
On the other hand, I would contend that the tendency of taking a lot of time just driving to corporations or education centers is more negative. Firstly, it is obvious that it is a waste of time for those who are always up to the ears. Long driving times per day accumulated over time might make people suffer from mental problems because the driving task requires high concentration and alertness, especially on highways where small mistakes can lead to traffic accidents. Secondly, more private vehicles like cars or motorbikes on the streets would worsen the traffic congestion in rush hours. Consequently, air pollution in center regions would be more intensive due to gas emissions from these transports.
In conclusion, whereas long driving hours to firms or schools have several merits, it seems to me that this trend is more disadvantageous for all the mentioned reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-29 | Nguyễn Ngọc Phương Vy | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | Nguyễn Ngọc Phương Vy | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-03 | huhuhuhu123 | 89 | view |
| 2022-06-23 | Taytor2609 | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-25 | dqnghuy | 73 | view |
- The idea that parks and outer spaces are replaced by gardens is more beneficial remains a source of controversy While there are many drawbacks of reducing the number of open spaces I strongly believe that the benefits are more remarkable On the one hand w 78
- Many people are now spending more and more time travelling to work or school Some people believe that this is a negative development while others think there are some benefits Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of the population living the cities in 3 continents and the whole world over the period of between 1950 and 2000 and a projected growth in 2023 Overall it is evident that the population of Latin America was always 73
- The table illustrates how much money was donated to developing countries in the period 2006 2010 by US and EU charities to support technological development Overall it is clear that total aid increased during this period US aid was considerably higher tha 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05828220859 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9089605771 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613496932515 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.8781259949 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.846153846 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0769230769 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7692307692 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243623476401 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757945128081 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373517543491 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142002484371 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484553229552 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.