Many people believe cities should not try to preserve their old, historic buildings and instead, they should destroy them and replace them with modern buildings. To what extent do you agree?
There are those who suppose that metropolitan authorities no longer need to conserve their old or historical city structures and that they ought to demolish these buildings in order to make way for new ones. From my own perspective, I firmly agree with this statement because it would save a lot of money and accommodate an overwhelming number of city dwellers.
The most compelling reason behind my belief is that preserving old, historic architectures would render fiscal pressure. The authorities indeed need to pay for not only the salaries of a substantial quantity of staff members but also the tremendously huge costs of day-to-day maintenance. It is unequivocal that many special features and construction materials of ancient buildings would be highly exorbitant due to their scarcity. At the same time, because of safety concerns, most of the historic city structures are not able to be used as tourist attractions anymore which means they no longer generate any tourists revenues. If the executive branch continues providing funding for these outmoded buildings, it is just a waste of money.
Another cogent point that supports my view is that new space is required to construct new buildings for citizens to reside in. In order to get better employment opportunities, education, or healthcare services, more individuals have been migrating to metropolises, making them over-crowded and leading to a lack of accommodation. As cities are already crammed with buildings and business premises, the demolishing of archaic constructions is of utmost significance or even compulsion so as to meet the demand for housing by erecting state-of-the-art apartments or houses for new residents.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that endeavors to sustain old or historic buildings would be futile and they should be instead supplanted by contemporary ones. This is due to monetary issues and the dire need of accommodating the burgeoning population of city dwellers. In my view, new buildings should be designed and structured to be long-lasting so people would not need to replace them in the near future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-26 | nguyendangquang.aspect | view | |
| 2021-09-14 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
- Many people believe cities should not try to preserve their old historic buildings and instead they should destroy them and replace them with modern buildings To what extent do you agree 89
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period 78
- Many ex criminals commit crimes again after being released from prison What are the reasons for these What measures can be taken to solve the issue 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 485, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... utmost significance or even compulsion so as to meet the demand for housing by erecting...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, as to, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33532934132 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18644467512 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59880239521 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.7737961039 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.076923077 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6923076923 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246827648598 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794829111131 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653881968035 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148295707389 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639133100327 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.