Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes
In the controversy of the effect of international tourism, many people claim that it does harm to resorts and destinations in their country. While there is a strong case for this view, solutions need to be applied to some of the problems which have arisen.
From my perspective, there are 3 primary reasons why indigenous people express no consent to foreign tourists. The first reason I would like to mention is the environmental damage. It can not be denied that tourism has remained staying in the top line of hot industries all over the world and the number of travels has shown no signs of abating, especially intercontinental ones. As a result, the amount of waste that is littered at travel spots has been remarkably augmenting. Sometimes, artworks are not even intact since some people carve or gash them, which is one of the most frustrating issues occurring to local citizens. Moreover, cultural exploitation is also the reason why natives think global tourism has a debilitating influence on their nations. We definitely can not oppose the financial contribution of tourism; however, it leads to the fact that the government has focused more on beneficial spots that the original beauty of destinations, such as scenic spots, heritages… has been refurbished for commercials. The last reason is the poor behavior of visitors. In some cases, foreigners misunderstand the culture of the country they visit, they even do actions that show rudeness and no respect towards natives and the culture.
All the above may be the most irritating issues that indigenous people have confronted with. Therefore, solutions have to be come up with to resolve those troubles. Regarding the first issue, the government needs to step in and put in place measures and policies to protect and conserve the nature and environment including plants, animals, heritages,... In the matter of the second problem, the authorities had better put forward methods to boost the national economy and coincidently preserve the initial beauty of nature. In terms of the third problem, I think cultural misunderstanding is the core reason, so having a general grasp of one culture before visiting it is not only a prerequisite for avoiding culture misapprehension but also enhances cultural exchanges.
In a nutshell, international tourism’s wreaking havoc on one nation has been demonstrated. Nevertheless, it actually has both sides and to my thought, the positive side surpasses the another. Hence, drawbacks have to be coped with emergently and thoroughly for the benefits of the country in general and residents in particular.
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 78
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 78
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...s view, solutions need to be applied to some of the problems which have arisen. From my...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ent including plants, animals, heritages,... In the matter of the second problem, ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t also enhances cultural exchanges. In a nutshell, international tourism’s wre...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, however, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, therefore, third, while, i think, in general, in particular, such as, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2203.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 420.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24523809524 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06243700477 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580952380952 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4763832025 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.947368421 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1052631579 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1052631579 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18765232543 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530134366195 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486980325576 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119706944245 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549710238361 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.