Many people believe that today there is a general increase in anti-social behaviour and lack of respect for others. What might have caused this situation? How to improve it?
It is unfortunate that in the midst of vast progress in every field of life there is also a growth in the anti-social behaviour and people have become less respectful of each other. In the following paragraphs, I shall analyze some causes of this phenomenon and suggest some ways forward.
Today we live in an era of technology in which the whole Earth has shrunk and become a global village. Everybody is connected to everybody through telephone lines and the internet but the warmth of relationships has taken a back seat. Most people have more than enough wealth, comfort and freedom but their hearts desire even more. To satisfy their hearts greed people have become workaholics and as a result have no time for family and friends. People have become selfish, isolated and indifferent. Each person is busy in his own quest for more. To add to it, the youngsters who are at ease with the new technology think that the elderly are good for nothing and that is why they don‘t respect them.
The changing family structure is another big cause of this phenomenon. Earlier, people lived in joint families and the grandparents were there to supervise the children. Now there are nuclear families in which both parents go out to work and children are left unattended in the hands of pervasive media like the TV and the internet. No one monitors what they watch and they see the programs full of violence and crime which makes them anti social. The pressure of consumerist society and peers also breeds anti social behaviour. To add to it, the values of traditional culture are being lost and people are following the global culture which is also considered anti social by the orthodox elderly.
There are many solutions to this problem. To begin with, people have to learn to strike a balance between work and family life. Government should also fix the maximum hours a worker can work per week so that exploitation is not there in the job market. People should revert back to the old joint family system. This would be in the benefit of all. The children would learn moral values and the elderly would be well looked after. Negative effects of excessive consumerism should be taught to the people. Media can play a big role in highlighting the good points of the traditional and the western culture so that the people can adopt good social values. Neighbourhood associations should be set up to connect people to each other.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, anti social behaviour and mutual lack of respect in today‘s times can be dealt with by taking simple measures and individuals and governments should collectively take these steps.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-25 | edmitric | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-12 | vishal sachdeva | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-04 | anchi | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-04 | anchi | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-10 | mangpahang | 73 | view |
- How important is it for individuals and countries to think about the future rather than to focus on the present 92
- Discuss the impact of computer games on young minds 58
- Some people think that the news media nowadays have influenced people s lives in negative ways To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- In some countries university students live at home with their families while they study whereas in other countries students attend University in another city Do you think the benefits of living far away from home during the university outweigh the disadva 92
- Nowadays people get information through news and papers but meanwhile are uncertain about the truth of these news Should we believe the journalists What qualities should a good journalist or correspondent have 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, well, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2201.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 459.0 315.596192385 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79520697168 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53916311215 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533769063181 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.503195682 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.04 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.36 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28 7.06120827912 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262667774471 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066152052477 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513445605798 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145208515073 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354233323928 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.