Many people think it is very important to protect the environment but they make no effort to do it themselves. Why is the case? What actions can be done to encourage individuals to protect the environment?
In the future, the world will face many new environmental problems, while we live in an age when many of us take responsibility for protecting the environment but make no attempt to do it. This essay will examine the main cause of this case and possible solutions to encourage people to conserve the environment.
The two main causes of individuals do not take action to environmental preservation are people having too many other things to worry about and they have a knowledge deficit. Nowadays, we're bombarded with messages about crime, the economy, and diseases, while the human brain can handle only so many competing concerns. For example, people much more likely to worry about a sick family member or a friend who just lost her job than environmental problems. Additionally, ignorance leads to be dismissive and doubtful about the reality of global climate change. For many of us, the effects of global climate change do not find an important topic, and thus do not seek out more information on the problem. Even when the problem starts to become a topic of interest, people purposefully set aside the facts because of the thought: “the things I could do won’t really make a difference".
One possible solution to this problem is disproving people's inclinations to think of global environmental problems as far-way. A critical, open-minded campaign can encourage people to share factual information. A fact that our environmental problems are not going to be solved on an individual level so we should try to find others to share concerns and brainstorm possible actions. On the other hand, I believe that ordinary people, through small, everyday actions, can also greatly contribute to protecting the environment. For instance, citizens in many countries, like the Netherlands, have now shifted towards using bicycles and subway trains for their daily travel instead of cars, which has so far helped reduce a tremendous amount of CO2 released into the air, and improved air quality.
In conclusion, people have different reasons for unawareness and non-recognition of environmental problems but people's effects could not negate. Environmental campaign and advance environmental information are some solutions government should release to encourage public preserve the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-24 | lamquang1809 | 74 | view |
| 2020-10-24 | king123478 | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-01 | vitbo | 89 | view |
- Some think we should take more measures to deal with criminals However others think that there is not much we can do to curb law breaking Discuss both sides and give your own opinions 73
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion 89
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- Many people find it difficult to live a healthy life What are the difficulties they face What can these people do to become healthier 79
- There are more advertisements aimed at children Some people believe that they have negative effects on children and should be banned Do you agree or disagree 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 827, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...aside the facts because of the thought: “the things I could do won’t really make ...
^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'solutions'' or 'solution's'?
Suggestion: solutions'; solution's
...ance environmental information are some solutions government should release to encourage ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35812672176 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07824583928 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595041322314 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7507950689 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.666666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21220673944 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686949992543 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476666445837 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126668292587 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585158006372 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 827, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...aside the facts because of the thought: “the things I could do won’t really make ...
^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'solutions'' or 'solution's'?
Suggestion: solutions'; solution's
...ance environmental information are some solutions government should release to encourage ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35812672176 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07824583928 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595041322314 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7507950689 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.666666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21220673944 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686949992543 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476666445837 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126668292587 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585158006372 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.