As mass communication and transport continue to grow, societies are becoming more and more alike leading to a phenomenon known as globalization. Some people fear that globalization will inevitably lead to the total loss of cultural identity. Agree/Disagree
In these circumstances, worldwide proliferation is becoming such a polemic plight that numerous individuals can hardly reach an absolute consensus. Furthermore, there exist conflicting views for a considerable space in time as to whether the process of globalizing is responsible for the annihilation of the cultural heritages or it is only the demand of modern world. As far as I am concerned, the developments occurred at a global scale can influence on the cultures of communality in some cases.
Categorically, the time we are dwelling in is defined as the fastest growing era on account of massive prevalence of media and transportation industry. As we know, the information era renders the social media to become highly enjoyed in popularity throughout the world. Moreover, an accelerating number of individuals contemplate that the state-of-the-art technologies are principally, deemed as the main contribution of the arising evolutions in these days. In particular, an the multifarious range of cutting-edge vehicles is engendering international amendment within the countries.
Needless to say, from the social standpoint, there are those who speculate that the advancements in technologies are giving rise to the depreciation in cultural inheritances. Reasoning that, the high standards of living is generating growing requisition for people to abstain themselves from the culture since the modern way of living is becoming discordant with the cultures and tradition of the country. In addition, at the present time, the vast majority of people prioritize the usage of social media in relation to face-to-face interaction.
In final analysis, although more people prefer the preservation of their cultural heritages and attempt to do adequate measure to stem the tide of this problem, I accentuate that some people disparage the cultures and traditions due to the way of their living and requirements of modern world.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-08-24 | hungdung2507 | 89 | view |
2022-08-10 | Duyanh1201 | 89 | view |
2021-08-15 | caomaiphuong050605 | 73 | view |
2020-11-10 | Trang Lưu Bảo Thắng | 61 | view |
2020-10-09 | LE ANH HUY | 85 | view |
- The diagram below shows the product life cycle of the car 64
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 84
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
- People think that the news media has influenced people s lives nowadays and it is a negative development To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
... views for a considerable space in time as to whether the process of globalizing is responsib...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 475, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...volutions in these days. In particular, an the multifarious range of cutting-edge ...
^^
Line 2, column 475, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'an' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: an; the
...volutions in these days. In particular, an the multifarious range of cutting-edge vehi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, as to, in addition, in particular, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55254237288 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42451744567 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566101694915 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.9352744026 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.909090909 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145620647216 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466989548683 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390846518755 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0830140110939 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307890490597 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.