Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others. Some people, therefore, think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding. Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages?
It is widely acknowledged that there are only a number of majors needed by societies. Accordingly, many people believe that students studying these majors ought to be financed university fees by governments, while those joining in less necessary subjects should pay for themselves. In my opinion, whether the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages should be carefully considered.
On the one hand, providing students studying crucial major of specializations with their university fees may help them reduce financial burdens. Indeed, besides study fees, a myriad of students have to make money after stressful hours at school in order to afford their personal needs. Obvious examples of that are renting and living fees. Therefore, assisting students who pursue important fields of study will be able to help them concentrate on their studies.
On the other hand, this policy seems to bring more negative effects than people expected. First off, there might be objections from other students due to this unfair treatment. Undoubtedly, students studying less significant subjects may think that they are underestimated by communities, as well as their future careers. As a result, this would lead to unexpected consequences, students trained in irrelevant domains might leave schools so as to show their disagreement. Moreover, since the policy will be beneficial for their budgets if they are a part of certain majors, more and more individuals will apply for these departments at universities. Gradually, that can cause an imbalance of employment in society. Without a doubt, there will be majors which include a higher number of specialists and workers than others; therefore leading to the downturn of societies.
To sum up, it is obvious that there will be needs for a number of majors which are crucial to communities. There is a policy that governments should assist students pursuing these fields with university fees, and ignore students in other departments. In this essay. I mentioned unfair and economic influences as reasons to disagree with this policy. Finally, each major has various contributions to society's economies; so it is reasonable to respect all specialists from different fields.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-07 | Tường Vân | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Selena17_ | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-14 | hieu13092006 | 56 | view |
| 2022-07-25 | levanhoan123 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-19 | Awadhesh Mourya | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 67
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Modern societies need specialists in certain fields but not in others Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society Those who choose to study less relevant subjects shoul 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... irrelevant domains might leave schools so as to show their disagreement. Moreover, sinc...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, but, finally, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as to, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44219653179 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97073416046 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56936416185 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.035933451 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1052631579 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2105263158 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.68421052632 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271821236184 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695847761006 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685656820105 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161991751725 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385287861489 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.