Nowadays congestion and traffic jam are a common problem in the cities. Some people believe that widening the roads can be a solution to this problem. Do you agree or disagree? What can be the solutions?
In this jet age of 21st century, the choked urban roads with massive number of vehicles have become worrying concern. Presently, it is argued that expansion of roads can prove to the fruitful to get rid of traffic congestions. Here I would like to discord with the given statement along with providing some remedies to handle this menace.
There are numerous reasons to support my view. To begin with, widening the roads in urban cities to control jams will come with its own disadvantages. For example, in order to carry out the expansion, the trees along with the roads will have to be diminished which in turn will give rise to more serious environmental issues such as air pollution and global warming. Therefore this idea is likely to bring more threat to the ecological balance rather than providing any worthy solution.
Further emphasizing, there will hardly be enough space left for other infrastructures due to the increased sizes of the city roads. To illustrate, the cities basically require various amenities such as shopping malls, parks, metro trains, parking areas and so on to provide a comfortable lifestyle to its dwellers. However, the expansion of roads will cover excessive land areas leaving limited spaces for other buildings and structures. Hence, roads increments do not seem to be appropriate for the overall development of the metropolis.
Now, numerous measures can also be mentioned to overcome this problem. Initially, authorities should aware the folks about the benefits of using public transport as compared to using their personal vehicles to travel. Besides this, car pooling is also a lucrative alternative where four to five people can commute in one automobile rather than each person driving his or her own. As a result, there will be minimal cars or bikes on road which will automatically reduce the congestion problem. What is more, government can impose heavy taxes on families buying more than one vehicle. Consequently, huge number of masses would either be restricted or discouraged to go for multiple cars for their daily usage.
To recapitulate, it can be clearly stated that widening the roads is not feasible idea to completely tackle this issue. However, the awareness among masses and levying taxes can definitely provide permanent solution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-30 | Rose sandhu12 | 89 | view |
- It is a good idea for teenagers to have jobs while they are still studying. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Nowadays congestion and traffic jam are a common problem in the cities. Some people believe that widening the roads can be a solution to this problem. Do you agree or disagree? What can be the solutions? 89
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 78
- Some people believe that mature employees are beneficial to a company. Others think that younger employees contribute more and hence are more beneficial to a company. Discuss both views with your own perception. 89
- Some people think that health care should be free for everyone. Others think that people should pay for their medical costs themselves. Discuss both the views with your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ch as air pollution and global warming. Therefore this idea is likely to bring more threa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...than providing any worthy solution. Further emphasizing, there will hardly be enoug...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, such as, as a result, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20698924731 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74692251518 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615591397849 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8958254964 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.947368421 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5789473684 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94736842105 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244216717846 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740065450681 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663513709171 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130427473561 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556101165155 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.