nowadays many people aim to create a balance between their work and other aspects of their life, however, only a few achieve it. What are the problems in doing this and what solutions can you suggest?
In the contemporary world individuals strive to contribute balanced lifestyle, nonetheless few people achieve it. There appear to be three main factors contribute to this problem and several possible solutions, as we will explain here.
On the one hand, there several problems that cause personal and professional life disbalance. First acute problem is social media. In other words people in order to be understood and share their thoughts visit social media networking sites such as Instagram, Pinterest, Tik tok which make them addicted. For example, according to time spent on social media statistics, people used 142 minutes of their everyday routines to stay on social media. lack of discipline is another issue, due to this problem people eager to accomplish less important task, as a result, they spend their precious time on procrastination and less urgent matters. Moreover, an extremely busy schedule is one of the main problems. The modern lifestyle of individuals force them to work in multitasking mode to solve all pressing issues, as a result, people are exhausted at work and tend to ignore their persona life.
Regarding potential solutions, reading books related to this topic can tackle this issue. Therefore, people by reading books where all the subtleties of time management are sanctified, can manage their time. For example, « The 4-hour workweek», «The seven habits of highly effective people» can help to create suitable routine. Besides, spending less time on social media can serve as remedy. Hence, if we spend our valuable time on caring for our family or on self-development, it will help to manage people`s time thoughtfully. Consequently, individuals can lead a harmonious lifestyle.
In conclusion, the problems with work-life balance occur due to social media disruption, excessive busyness and lack of discipline. However, this issue can be curbed through reading books and spending less amount of time on social media.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-30 | trikhung777 | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-17 | samdilnura | 84 | view |
| 2021-05-14 | Sumit mirdha | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-29 | Amnusheenh | 84 | view |
- Some people think exposure to modern technology at an earlier age is good for children while others claim that it is harmful to their development Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- In many countries today there are concerns about the unhealthy lifestyles that people lead What health issues are linked to modern lifestyles What answers to these problems can you suggest 84
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 84
- A tendency that the news reported in the media focuses on problems and emergencies rather than positive developments is harmful to both the individuals and the society Do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age Some think they should begin at at least 7 years old Discuss both views and give your own opinion 44
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 446, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lack
...ryday routines to stay on social media. lack of discipline is another issue, due to ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39935064935 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91328221663 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597402597403 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2028289475 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8235294118 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4117647059 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212057389696 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686849300222 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351200694768 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127459590125 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266619290175 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.