Nowadays, some employer think academic qualities are more important than life experience and personal qualities when they choose employees? Why does this take place? And this is negative or positive development?
There are opposing views regarding recruiters require formal qualifications rather than personal past experience or characteristics. This can stem from many causes and there are positive and negative effects.
There are several factors responsible for this trend, the most important of which is that such jobs as doctors, engineers require their applicants to possess strong technical or job- related skills, which can be reflected through their degrees. No matter how good the interpersonal skills a candidate has, if he or she does not have the special skills required in the job description, then his or her application should not be considered in the hiring process. Moreover, looking from an economic perspective, these recognized qualifications can guarantee that these new workers can come up with comprehensive strategies in order to cope with the erratic nature of the job market since they had prior knowledge of doing such activities during their internship.
The positive effect to be taken into account is that highly skilled workers can do an excellent job which ensures the quality of goods and services, hence maintaining the organization’s growth. By way of illustration, Gia Dinh Hospital establishes incredibly stringent employment procedures that require candidates to have many types of healthcare specialist qualifications, thereby spotting skillful surgeons who make substantial contributions to its development. However, there are some downsides if the newly-hired employees don’t equip themselves with life experience in some specific fields such as business, marketing. Regardless of their strategic plans, such personal experience can become valuable resources to draw on in the future workplace.
In conclusion, while favoring educational qualifications over traits and past experience can be beneficial, it also has several drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-26 | Vo Phan Minh Hieu | 84 | view |
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Nowadays, some employer think academic qualities are more important than life experience and personal qualities when they choose employees? Why does this take place? And this is negative or positive development? 84
- People are surrounded by all kinds of advertising. They both have important and negative influences to our lives. Agree or Disagree? 84
- The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree? 61
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea. What are the reasons and solutions? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...mal qualifications rather than personal past experience or characteristics. This can stem from ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun healthcare seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much healthcare', 'a good deal of healthcare'.
Suggestion: much healthcare; a good deal of healthcare
...cedures that require candidates to have many healthcare specialist qualifications, thereby spot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...cational qualifications over traits and past experience can be beneficial, it also has several ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, then, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82481751825 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28597703172 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686131386861 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.3457609799 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.6 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.7 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138615413371 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576523111154 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415297090959 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867697456091 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554624089722 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.