Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening.
Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Recent decades have witnessed the tremendous improvement in monitoring technology such as global positioning system (GPS) or security cameras. While it can not be denied that this advancement has contributed several positive impacts to society, I would argue that this is bringing more harm than good at the moment.
To begin with, there is no doubt that technology offers authority a great vehicle to enhance their citizen’s security and welfare. For example, they can prevent malicious cybercrime, like identity thieves and blackmail. With the right purpose, technology enables the government to protect the financial and intellectual properties, which are often vulnerable to be attacked unknowingly. Additionally, unlawful activities are easily exposed to justice by the advanced features of cameras and microphones. They have played a significant role in supporting police to investigate some “seem to be” unsolvable criminal cases.
Monitoriztion with technology, on the other hand, has created countless predicaments for people. Some technology companies have taken user identities and sold them for commercial and political purposes. Even though regulations have been approved to restrain this problem, but technology garments and secret applications are still too sophisticated for a user to understand how to avoid its risk. For instance, many companies may take advantage of the Internet’s loopholes to trick people by their business email compromise with uncommon and subtle hyperlinks. Indeed, the majority are often unaware of and uneducated to tackle this issue.
In my perspective, the world has become a “slightly less lovely” place regarding the adverse feature of monitored technology. Whereas technology will continue to offer people numerous convenience and comfort, nonetheless, I fear its consequential impact is likely to outweigh the benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-02 | monmon12345 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | Nguyễn Thị Thanh Thảo | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | my220904 | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-17 | iamketpatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-20 | mindfulielts | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011 The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one person households 96
- Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 78
- Many people believe that learning a foreign language is a very difficult task What are the most difficult things about learning a foreign language What is the best way to overcome them 78
- Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 84
- Some people think that being able to communicate with others online is breaking down geographical barriers and enabling people who would normally never have the chance to meet to communicate What are the advantages of international communication online Ar 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, so, still, whereas, while, for example, for instance, no doubt, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82608695652 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13502749518 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.70652173913 0.561755894193 126% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5325002263 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.857142857 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198381522827 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561231669461 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0227448450576 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105126387202 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175471583585 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.