Nowadays, there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development. Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a trend that the media reports have a greater preference for the information mainly exploiting shocking issues than the pieces of optimistic news. This is believed to have an adverse impact on either individuals or society. While I agree that this trend can be detrimental, I believe that there are still several beneficial effects.
One the one hand, there are several advantages when media reports are covered by the problems and emergent news. More specifically, such platforms of media as television, newspaper, radio are regarded as the tools to deliver all the social information to citizens. It is true that thanks to them, the latest news provision is constantly updated. The urgent issues such as disasters and infections, crimes are well informed in community to shield citizens from any potential financial loss, health damage and physical injury.
On the other hand, when colossal numbers of positive developments are not daily mentioned because content related to the emergencies is more favorable, I believe that it is conducive to the poor upshot. In a small scale, as for the individuals, it can exert a negative impact which is exposed by their pessimistic thoughts or attitudes after watching or reading the news. An example is a series of shocking accidents on the street, which probably exacerbates readers’ mood and leads to a loss of the sense of security when commuting. In a larger scale, people can miss out on the positive things such as the development of the quality of. This can lead to a prevalent thought that life is meaningless and not worth living.
In conclusion, although this trend has pros and cons, I strongly concur that the positive content published on mass media should be more focused on than the negative one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-11 | phamdinhquocvu | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | Hong Tam | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | Hong Tam | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-11 | aceg1000 | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-12 | phuong cao | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 78
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life. What are those problems. Should government encourage people to move to regional towns? 78
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life. What are those problems. Should government encourage people to move to regional towns? 61
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life. What are those problems. Should government encourage people to move to regional towns? 67
- Many students take part-time jobs while studying in university. Do advantages outweigh disadvantages? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more focused on than the negative one.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, well, while, as for, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05802047782 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82656503254 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566552901024 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7478899152 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156048109552 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510660123217 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493536776369 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098444713498 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417833870998 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.