Open plan office no walls no barriers Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages

Essay topics:

Open plan office no walls, no barriers. Do the advantages outweigh the
disadvantages?

Nowadays, an open office with no walls and barriers becomes more and more
popular. In my point of view, this trend provides more benefits than its drawbacks.
On one hand, there are several advantages of this trend. Firstly, the disappearance
of walls and barriers will allow members to interact more with others. Therefore,
people will have more conservation, creating an ideal atmosphere to work. In addition,
members are able to discuss work comfortably to increase their productivity.
Another positive aspect that an open office offers is saving a lot of money. Companies
can entirely use that money, which is paid for building boundaries, for investing
in another project. Moreover, the design of an open plan office helps the director to
observe the whole workplace. Walls and limits have long been a stumbling block
for managers, stopping them from having a clear and complete view of the entire
workplace, causing them a great deal of difficulty in leading their teams. Thus,
with an open office, the supervisors have more control over their staff.
On the other hand, an open-plan office has some disadvantages. The main serious
weakness of this trend is the lack of privacy for people. Members do not have their
own spaces, some workers find it uncomfortable to work under the supervision of
other people. Hence, this may lead to decreasing their work productivity. The
second drawback of this open station is that workers can easily lose their
concentration. There are many things which distract people from their job such as
unwanted noises or conservation between other members.
In conclusion, an open plan station offers more plus points than downsides to the
both members and companies.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-09-10 mrsaidovs@mail.ru 56 view
2024-09-01 Ahmad_off 67 view
2024-09-01 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-09-01 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-09-01 Ahmad_off 67 view
Essays by user lethaianh :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28880866426 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71563663319 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58844765343 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2584807712 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3888888889 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3888888889 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 22.0 4.38176352705 502% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1895474533 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610870888752 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771384266743 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0515071896756 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747448230406 0.056905535591 131% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.