People are having more and more sugar-based drinks. What are the reasons? What are the solutions to make people drink less?
In the modern society despite the fact that junk food is linked to serious health issues, the vast majority of people regularly consume a large amount of sugar-based drinks. This essay will first suggest that the biggest problem caused by such discretionary choice is beverage marketing and then submit substituting soft drinks for alternative sugarless drinks as the most viable solution.
Today all over the world, especially in developing countries, sugary drink consumption is rising dramatically due to beverage marketing. That is to say sugary drink marketing plays a significant role in affecting food ration. It is important to notice that beverage companies, investing billion dollars in advertising, aimed directly at children and adolescents. For example, a 2020 study found that kids ages 2-11 saw twice as many ads for soft drinks than for other beverages and they also saw four times as many for certain drinks than adults did.
A possible solution to this problem would be to restrict access to children watching TV channels or YouTube videos or if it is possible, block some channels which have contracts with sugary drink companies. In addition, for those who became sugar addicted the best decision would be to substitute sugary beverages for different healthier beverages. It can be, for example, just water or those who preferred the carbonation should give sparkling water a try. Finally, if the taste is too bland, sugar addicted people should give a chance to naturally flavored drinks.
In conclusion, this essay analyzed the principal problem of being interested in sugar-based drinks, namely the fact that advertising is everywhere, and offered solutions such as avoiding impact of the advertisement on diet and replacing soft drinks with healthier beverages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-24 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-02 | bapcai | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-17 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | Nguyễn Ngọc Phương Vy | 73 | view |
- Countries should spend moneyn on trains rather than new roads Do you agree or disagree 73
- Many people believe that countries should produce food for the whole population and import as little food as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Countries should spend moneyn on trains rather than new roads Do you agree or disagree 87
- Some people think news has no connection to people s lives so it is a waste of time to read the news in newspapers and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the advantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...tice that beverage companies, investing billion dollars in advertising, aimed directly ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, so, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36524822695 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81058962024 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.1951032358 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.545454545 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174807869085 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640585329496 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379320013449 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109594362322 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212499853595 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.