People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to modern buildings. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many scholars believe that advanced structures ought to be developed by demolishing the ancient ones. I fully disagree with this notion as prehistoric buildings represent the true identity of nation as well as revenue can be generated from this.
The ageless edifices show the history and culture of a region which needs to be preserved for imparting knowledge to younger generations. As with the aid of this one can explore the beauty of architectural designs and learn about the customs of previous centuries. Moreover, these magnificent erections create curiosity among children to gain more information about history and make their connections with cultural roots stronger. To evident my point of view a report published by “Archaeological Survey of India” states that Golden Temple in Amritsar city represents the rich culture of Sikhism and motivating their younger devotees to follow the principles of Sikh religion.
Another pivotal aspect of maintaining the status of primeval constructions is that it is crucial for economic growth. Most of the palaces and other creations used by emperors can be turned into tourist spots and museums which in return not only create profits but also develop new employment prospects for natives. According to a survey conducted by UNWTO 3.2 billion people visited Taj Mahal in India through which India earned 7 billion US dollars.
In the view of arguments outlined above one can conclude that eliminating old structures from world for constructing new up-to-date buildings could have negative impact on economy, as these outdated buildings are bringing huge money from visitors of other nations. As well inspiring children to absorb historical and cultural ethics.
for updated material WHATSAPP ON 89-0606-0002
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-24 | quynhhuong656 | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-25 | minhquanvn | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | Nguyễn Tấn Anh | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-03 | xinyu961121 | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-03 | xinyu961121 | 80 | view |
- Some people believe that watching TV is bad for children while others think that watching TV has more beneficial effects on children Discuss both views and state your opinion 95
- Some people believe that watching TV is bad for children while others think that watching TV has more beneficial effects on children Discuss both views and state your opinion 89
- The bar charts below provide information about percentages of students who are proficient in a foreign language in different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should wr 89
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 92
- Many criminals commit crimes as soon as they released from prison What are the causes of this What effects will this have on society 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44029850746 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85967968084 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664179104478 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3145590377 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.545454545 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0943451931032 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0300730427715 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392716590924 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619303188533 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418975038519 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.