A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
A person’s value these days seems to be judged based on social status and properties. No longer common values such as honour, kindness, and trust, seem to be not crucial anymore. But actually, these values still matter to this day.
In a modern society, kindness is the most valuable worth in a person. Kindness connect people and tie their bond, whereas social status and properties qute restrict. Social status and material possessions do not link people together, unless the old-fashioned aspects are present in a affiliation. Common interest and emotions create a connection between people which come to realize the essence of communicating and interacting. However, the essence in social status and material possessions aren’t found. These values may lead to greediness and arrogance, surely people won’t like those kind of negative traits.
The community may judge by social status, owned properties or looks. But on top of that, honour, kindness, and trust are much more valuable in a person. Social status and owned properties aren’t the answers to make us genuinely happy for a long time. Though it may be true that modern society often judge from social status and material possessions, people would still look up to their personalities, because that matters the most. The society will respect people with good traits than material possessions and status.
To conclude, a person’s worth about honour, kindness, and trust are more important and valuable than social status and material possessions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | Leauren | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | Nweze christabel | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | Nweze christabel | 67 | view |
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
- Some people spend their lives working and have little interest in their leisure and hobbies. Others spend their time on leisure and hobbies.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- The chart below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Many people believe that inherent talent is more important than practice in many fields like sport, or music, according to them. Great musicians and sportsmen are born and cannot be created. However, others claim that talent has little to do with success 56
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...he old-fashioned aspects are present in a affiliation. Common interest and emotio...
^
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
...rrogance, surely people won't like those kind of negative traits. The community ma...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, look, may, so, still, whereas, kind of, such as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 240.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.425 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81236110768 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3728281125 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340186297933 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11950145568 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753550520111 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221268479658 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407380398924 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.