Plastic bags, plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment. What damage does plastic do to the environment? What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem?
There are serious concerns about the extensive use of plastic products, such as bags, bottles, and various other packaging and disposable items. The world’s environment is suffering in many ways, but I believe that individuals, governments, and businesses can take some measures to tackle those issues.
There is no denying that the environment suffers significantly when people regularly produce and use plastics. One of the problems associated with plastics is that they take thousands of years to disintegrate. Therefore, every year millions of tons of plastic waste are pollute the land, waterways, and oceans. For example, plastic products are likely to have negative effects on food chains, particularly on aquatic creatures. If plastic waste is thrown away, species will accidentally swallow it as they can hardly recognize that it is not food. Moreover, in some underdeveloped parts of the world, people burn plastics to dispose of them, and that produces large amounts of toxic emissions that pollute the atmosphere and are a direct hazard to human health.
However, every individual, as well as businesses and governments should take potential can take certain actions to minimize those damaging consequences. First, the government can promote awareness of the need to limit the use of plastics through educational and advertising campaigns. Besides, they can introduce new rules, such as levying taxes on the use or manufacturing of plastic products help reduce their amounts. In addition, each citizen can participate in this campaign by using non-plastic or more ‘green’ products such as glass bottles or canvas bags, which will force the companies to change their profitable aims and become associated with more environmentally friendly brands and trends, unless they want to be eliminated by the public. The members of the community can support their authority to seek the fraud in the new laws and the cheating of the company for not following the regulations.
In conclusion, I believe that people can use many methods to prevent plastic products from harming the vulnerable environment. In terms of their massive quantities and hard disintegration, we have no action except to limit their use and apply strict rules in society.
- The maps show the changes of the road access to a hospital between 2007 and 2010 Describe the main features of the maps 73
- Art is considered an important part of a society as well as an expression of its culture Do you think it is important for children to be taught art Do you think children should be encouraged to focus on art rather than other subjects 89
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include 89
- Some people think that the best way to motivate and encourage people to work hard is to pay them based on how much they produce and sell To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic social and commercial perspectives What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'polluted'.
Suggestion: polluted
...r millions of tons of plastic waste are pollute the land, waterways, and oceans. For ex...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40509915014 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96456182676 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586402266289 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6632940173 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.2 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5333333333 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285649200073 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967204075324 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435778012452 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162239417067 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608410011012 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.