At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.
Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, many countries are facing the rejuvenation of the population problem. Although older people’s experience is a valuable asset to society, young adults are the future of nations.
Young people are more creatively and more efficiently in the problem-solving aspect, and they can provide a well-educated workforce for countries. Generally, young adults are more energetic and powerful; meanwhile, they have more time and abilities to serve their countries and build a prosperous society. For example, when people are facing severe problems, young people’s knowledge of innovating is often more productive with less effort. Compared with older people, sometimes their conservative attitude toward difficulty is not an excellent way to overcome difficult. Also, some manufacturing sectors need a considerable number of young workers to meeting the growing demand.
On the other hand, rejuvenation of the population can reduce the government’s pressure on health care spending. It is widely known that most medical needs and costs occur in the last years of life. If there were more young people in countries, the government could spend more money on more infrastructures and bring tangible benefits to the public.
Nevertheless, older people's experience and wisdom are indeed a valuable asset to countries. They can work as consultants and impart their knowledge and skills to the younger generation. For example, some senior managers can teach young people how to manage a company and how to provide better services for the public.
In conclusion, young people can provide a better quality labor force for countries and promote social development, although older people are also helpful to countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | Sushmabenarji | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | julieehung | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | happyhappy | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | enassar | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | WAFA | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Other believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and gi 73
- In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have positive or negative effects on society? 56
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oung adults are the future of nations. Young people are more creatively and mor...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...workers to meeting the growing demand. On the other hand, rejuvenation of the p...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bring tangible benefits to the public. Nevertheless, older peoples experience a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rovide better services for the public. In conclusion, young people can provide ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61685823755 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08602079012 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567049808429 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4059616634 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.714285714 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142037345171 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528471719233 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383646978939 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0803014821436 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435300510433 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.