Problems about younger leader and diretors
Nowadays, it is true some people think younger leader would be better, i totally like with this essay. The younger leader more understand than old men about fashionable world. It is because the younger leader were born from new generation where the old men can not follow expansion era, in a row lessen energy with aging age, for example a younger leader or directors can make a advertisement with modern style that can interesting people attention because that advertisement seem tease and appropriate with people taste in the new world, as result the younger leader better than old leader.
On the other hand, younger leader have a disadvantage that is reckless. It is due to youthful which is still burning with the lack of experience, for example usually the younger people hurried for take a judgment without think about effect from that judgment in the future, as result oftentimes they repent it.
It is important, however the younger leader or directors is better than old men but only if the younger leader much learn from experience by old men.
- Effect media coverage of celebrities for children 56
- The graph of the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a european country 1979 and 2004 61
- The graph of the popullation change between 1940 and 2000 in three countries in the U.S. state of oregon 56
- Problems about younger leader and diretors 56
- Impact distance of age between parents and children 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'can' requires base form of the verb: 'follow'
Suggestion: follow
...ew generation where the old men can not following expansion era, in a row lessen energy w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 381, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... a younger leader or directors can make a advertisement with modern style that ca...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, for example, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 41.998997996 45% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 1615.20841683 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 179.0 315.596192385 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94972067039 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55901292961 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 176.041082164 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575418994413 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 506.74238477 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 16.0721442886 37% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 122.778934132 49.4020404114 249% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 147.666666667 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306542261574 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186294435504 0.084324248473 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600438918312 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219504479463 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399879274896 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 78.4519038076 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.