Q19 Developing countries require help offered by international organizations to ensure healthy and sustainable development. Some people think that financial aid is important. Others believe that practical aid and advice is more important. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Recently, the question of how to assist emerging countries has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that practical help and advice for less-developed nations should take precedence over financial support, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with the former stance. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that third world countries can benefit a great deal from monetary assistance do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that an astronomical amount of money is required to establish a high quality of infrastructures, including railways and roads, making it possible for poorer nations to invigorate economic growth. In fact, these nations are incapable of building expensive facilities without receiving monetary help from global foundations. Furthermore, a myriad of citizens in Africa are suffering from a lack of basic necessities, such as primary education and balanced meals. If it were not for financial assistance, they would have difficulty living a better life.
My opinion, however, is that more emphasis should be placed on practical support and technical advice than financial help. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that although it seems beneficial to gain a huge sum of money from international charities for developing countries in the short term, relying on monetary support causes them to become more dependent on other countries in the long term. Thus, receiving only advice and invaluable knowledge facilitates economic and political progress. In addition, the majority of emerging countries across the globe are experiencing a high level of corruption. If third world countries acquire numerous useful pieces of advice from experts in global organisations, this phenomenon will be alleviated. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that practical advice and assistance should be a priority for the reasons discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-09 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-22 | idid382002 | 89 | view |
- Some people think living in big cities is bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Q Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- QQ8 As countries develop more and more people buy and use their own cars Do you think the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment 89
- Many parents these days work in other countries taking their families with them Do you think the advantage of the development outweighs its disadvantage 89
- Some people prefer to have temporary jobs which means they only work a few months in a year and use the rest of the time to do what they want What is your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... in Africa are suffering from a lack of basic necessities, such as primary education and balanced...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that practica...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, third, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50294117647 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99049677048 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614705882353 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1819889376 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.058823529 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18692985983 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523750158855 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537474295042 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110604852486 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623041343429 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.