Q6 : Some people prefer to have temporary jobs, which means that they only work a few months in a year and use the rest of time to do what they want. What is your opinion?
Recently, types of employment have become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that working as a temporary employee allows people to live a better life, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that there are a number of advantages that can be derived from working as a part-timer. Perhaps the principal benefit is that adults working temporarily are less likely to experience high levels of stress considering that they can quit their occupation with greater ease. Furthermore, the majority of companies have a predisposition not to force them to have a tight grasp of work, which makes it possible for them to have a better quality of life. This is because businesses consider that these workers can be replaced with people working full-time at any time.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that working part-time merely brings with it positives. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that part-time employees often have difficulty building work experience that will be invaluable in their future careers. To exemplify, one recent article released by the Seoul Times illustrates that approximately 70% of people working part-time failed to gain a permanent occupation in 2015, and it turned out that the main reason for this phenomenon was their temporary work experience exerting a negative influence on job interviewers. In addition, a multitude of temporary workers often struggle to support their living costs given that the average wage of part-time workers is much lower than that of full-timers. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-09-08 | phuonghangncqvbn | 56 | view |
2021-09-04 | idid382002 | 89 | view |
2021-08-09 | idid382003 | 89 | view |
2021-08-04 | idid382003 | 78 | view |
2021-07-15 | idid382003 | 84 | view |
- Q3 Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species Some Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem Others believe that effective measures can be 89
- Q15 Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Q8 As countries develop more and more people buy and use their own cars Do you think the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment 89
- Q20 The family has a great influence on children s development but the influence from outside the home plays a bigger part in children s life Do you agree or disagree 89
- Q13 The spread of multinational companies and the increase of globalization produces positive effects for everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...above, I also find these persuasive. In conclusion, it is undeniable that there...
^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19230769231 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85895734973 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582840236686 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6944619209 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172510447525 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529762027065 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041363889992 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950949455085 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459935263502 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.