The qualities that help people reach success in modern life cannot be learned in university or other academic institutions To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

The qualities that help people reach success in modern life cannot be learned in university or other academic institutions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Opinions are split regarding whether higher education can facilitate people with essential skills to succeed. I believe that universities do help people develop personal qualities such as the ability to work in solitary, teamwork skills, perseverance, and critical thinking.

Firstly, when university students prepare for their exams or try to complete individual assignments, they learn to work on their own and take accountability for their outcomes. Secondly, when they work in a group to accomplish a shared commitment, they have to learn to cooperate with others to achieve that shared goal. This pushes them to learn to be more responsible for their part and to become good team players. These qualities are highly valued in today’s job market irrespective of whether they opt to work for a company or become self-employed.

Studying at university allows learners to cultivate other crucial personal traits such as grit and critical thinking skill. As for the former, the endless academic knowledge at university is by no means easy, and so undergraduates often spend months on end running deadlines, collecting information, writing reports, and trying to complete the assignment on time. It is worth noting that they may come across unwanted problems or encounter setbacks along the way, and these difficulties force them to stand firm and make adjustments. As a result, they can enhance their resilience, flexibility, determination, all of which are evidently important for people’s success.

In conclusion, it would be illogical to say that universities do not teach people qualities that are wholly necessary for people’s success in the future.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-12-26 chinh11111 84 view
2021-12-26 chinh11111 78 view
2020-11-30 Naive Dinosaur 72 view
Essays by user chinh11111 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, as for, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48837209302 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05828445044 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635658914729 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8265983646 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.727272727 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1829779691 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711155679867 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634499664466 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132321378325 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627778871252 0.056905535591 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.