Question: Some people believe that the world should have only one government rather than a national government. Do you think the benefits of this system outweigh its disadvantages?
The relentless existing unrest in some areas of the world has raised concern over the way governments operate these days and whether they are still effective or not. While some people espouse a new policy in which a government is converged from all others; from my perspective, they should alter their mindset soon as this idea only causes more ruptures in our already immersed with turmoil world.
That one global government can yield salutary results is undeniable. Firstly, we can mitigate wars. The recalcitrance of all long-lasting battles is due to the yen to plunder abundant natural resources of others; the oppressed then struggle to defend their countries, which results in sacrifices: avarice begets wars, wars beget ennui. However, the inception of a new united government can solve this conundrum. Secondly, another notable fringe benefit is that we will have to implement fewer red tapes: going abroad can require us to execute unnecessary and tedious procedures but since all are one, we no longer have to perturb on what to do on our first trip. Moreover, should people in one distant area encounter unexpected catastrophes, namely floods, droughts, or ever anarchism; succor from multitudes of channels will be mustered to them: emigration or immigration will take less time to be complemented.
However, even though a collective government is ideal for many individuals, the realization of this perishes in embryo. Once every government is commingled into one, a dilemma will be posed: which country leads? Were it economic leviathans like the USA, the UK, et cetera; inequity would likely overtake plenty of countries as white supremacy feasibly ensues. Another powerful party is China, yet the belligerence tendency of the country makes others concerned. However, an acephalous authority is unlikely to take off. Moreover, if power centers on a sole government, riots beckon as a ramification of dichotomy among distinct political regimes as well as religions. These combats would ascend the world soon, and citizens only suffer more. In addition, the assimilation also blurs the line of unique cachets of different countries and human diversity might be confined. Therefore, the jury of whether the merits of one absolute government will eclipse their minuses is still out.
In conclusion, I believe it is wise if we just voice our opinions to our leaders for them to resolve them. It will attain more fruition than concocting all miscellaneous notions together just to generate a hodgepodge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-07 | stanie calitex | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | Phạm Minh Trang | 78 | view |
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon A new supermarket S is planned for the town The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should 61
- The bar charts below provide information about percentages of students who are proficient in a foreign language in different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should wr 78
- Sample topic Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Who s to blame for animals extinction 89
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30174563591 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84929279164 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 176.041082164 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653366583541 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2575973862 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.894736842 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1052631579 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73684210526 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211683203195 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548266183787 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510979836861 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114182814799 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534256019334 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 78.4519038076 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.