Recent research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes after they are released.
Why is this the case?
What can be done to solve this problem?
It is true that most of the prisoners are doing crimes after they are released from jail. The main reason behind this phenomenon is nothing but the attitude and behaviour of the community. It might be tackled by the awareness programmes and self-employed jobs to the hostages.
Society often thinks the criminals could not change their minds and they will commit crimes again and again. This is because of a lack of knowledge and underlined thinking about the prisoners. Common people always avoid such persons and regret to provide jobs and any support to them. Therefore, unemployment and failure to cope with society would lead the criminals to go back to their past life. For instance, in jail council reports from Indonesia, the main reason behind the return of criminals is family and social rejection with unemployment.
Nevertheless, it would be managed by the proper education to the family members and society through counselling, proposals and experiments. Governments could make legislation and employment programme for the jail returner would be effective to the core. Instruct the community to accept and encourage them to provide maximum support and make changes to mingle with each other. Members of the community help them to find suitable jobs for survival and lead better life. For example, community organizations recruit many prisoners to do part-time employments and provide financial support to do self employed businesses in India makes a huge difference.
Criminals have an instinct to return their criminality even after the release from prison due to social and family refusal. However, society and governments could do a major impact on them by the proper constitution.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-01-26 | sonnn | 89 | view |
2021-12-25 | Nguyễn Xuân Sơn | 84 | view |
2021-12-04 | wendywill0307 | 89 | view |
2021-12-04 | wendywill0307 | 89 | view |
2021-11-27 | Jasmeetgillkaur | 56 | view |
- The chart shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of air pollutants in four countries in 2000 67
- The graph shows average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualification in Newzealand and the proportion of men and women who held them in 2005
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think that the range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[2]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'regret providing'.
Suggestion: regret providing
...on people always avoid such persons and regret to provide jobs and any support to them. Therefore...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help them find' instead.
Suggestion: help them find
...th each other. Members of the community help them to find suitable jobs for survival and lead bet...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, for instance, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29889298893 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81235527504 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564575645756 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8129322032 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.7333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15286411593 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529331278098 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544951829132 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111205859001 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552136271482 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[2]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'regret providing'.
Suggestion: regret providing
...on people always avoid such persons and regret to provide jobs and any support to them. Therefore...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help them find' instead.
Suggestion: help them find
...th each other. Members of the community help them to find suitable jobs for survival and lead bet...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, for instance, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29889298893 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81235527504 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564575645756 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8129322032 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.7333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15286411593 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529331278098 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544951829132 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111205859001 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552136271482 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.