Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree
It is undeniable that the natural habitat and environment these days have seriously deteriorated due to the detrimental impacts caused by human activities. While I accept that it is essential that governments take the responsibility for alleviating this problem, I believe that ordinary people should also engage in dealing with the issue.
On the one hand, it is vitally important that figures of authority should take part in protecting and conserving the environment. This is due to the fact that they have to be responsible for what they have done. For the past decade, many national authorities have generated and imposed policies and projects leading to habitat loss. For instance, deforestation has occurred on a global scale, especially in Europe countries, thus causing extinction of a large number of animal species. Another reason is the governments' ability to exert significant impacts that an ordinary person can not do, such as charging the lawbreakers for cutting down trees.
On the other hand, I assume that individuals also play a vital role in mitigating environmental damages. Obviously, Each person making even a minor contribution can produce an enormously important outcomes. Examples of this include donations, social activities taken place in local areas which aim at supporting governments and protecting environment. In addition, I believe that individuals should have a say in environmental issues since maintaining the environmental sustainability need a global engagement.
In conclusion, both governments and ordinary citizens should be involved in the environmental conservation as their role is both essential in equal measure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-09 | Phạm Phú Trường | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | PardissRS | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | vudinhthuyornot | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | Vũ Thuỳ Liên | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | Vũ Thuỳ Liên | 84 | view |
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. 61
- The governments' investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. 78
- Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces. How do you think this has changed the way we work. Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology? 78
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. Agree or Disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e countries, thus causing extinction of a large number of animal species. Another reason is the g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...f animal species. Another reason is the governments ability to exert significant impacts th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60080645161 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24740501139 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616935483871 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0978518372 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.75 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161982212012 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553939778134 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050538708353 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104777654526 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465435517046 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.