Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals.
It is undeniable that the natural habitat and environment these days have seriously deteriorated due to the harmful impacts caused by human activities. While I accept that it is essential that governments take the responsibility for alleviating this problem, I believe that ordinary people should also engage in dealing with the issue.
On the one hand, it is vitally important that figures of authority should take part in protecting and conserving the environment. This is due to the fact that they have to be responsible for what they have done. For the past decade, many national authorities have generated and imposed policies and projects leading to habitat loss. For instance, deforestation has occurred on a global scale, especially in Europe countries, thus causing extinction an influx of animal species. Another reason is the governments' ability to exert significant impacts that an ordinary person can not do, such as charging the lawbreakers for cutting down trees.
On the other hand, I assume that normal people also play a vital role in mitigating environmental damages. Obviously, Each person making even a minor contribution can produce an enormously important outcomes. Examples of this include donations, social activities taken place in local areas which aim at supporting governments and protecting environment. In addition, I believe that median people should have a say in environmental issues since maintaining the environmental sustainability need a global engagement.
In conclusion, both governments and ordinary citizens involved in the environmental conservation as their role is both essential in equal measure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-09 | Phạm Phú Trường | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | PardissRS | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | vudinhthuyornot | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | Vũ Thuỳ Liên | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | Vũ Thuỳ Liên | 84 | view |
- The governments' investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. 78
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. 61
- Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces. How do you think this has changed the way we work. Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology? 78
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. Agree or Disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...f animal species. Another reason is the governments ability to exert significant impacts th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59760956175 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18641423279 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609561752988 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0188428661 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.083333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159998373205 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554410136541 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470308534317 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941184584725 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341102632419 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.