Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a suggestion that the best way to help poor countries is to raise money for them by rich countries, but others believe that donating money for poor countries is absolutely not an ideal action. In my opinion, developed countries can help others by money, but not always.
The main reason that poor countries cannot develop themselves is the national fund shortage. The government, and so do residents, do not have good opportunities to earn money due to many factors such as weather condition of that nation. Children are not educated, the crime proportion is increasing year after year. Therefore, donating money to poor countries is recognized as a mercy action from developed countries to help other countries have an innovation in their living condition.
However, as I have said before, giving money to poor countries does not thoroughly solve poverty. Africa countries are the typical examples for this opinion. Because of poverty, many developed countries decide to give financial aid to Africa, especially North African countries each year, even those countries do not need to pay for their debts. But in reality, African countries still cannot make progress in their economy or technology, which stands at the position of the most underdeveloped continent compared to the world. The importance is, all money donated for residents in there is used for temporary purposes like medicines, improving accommodations or even buying water. The government does not pay attention to education, which women do not know anything about reproductive skills, so, children are born in an unplanned way, which makes a struggle mission for government. As a result, I suggest that instead of rising fund to poor regions, developed countries should allow residents have opportunities to study abroad and find a job, which will help poor people access both basic and advanced knowledge, by that way, poor students will be able to make their nation better
In conclusion, there is a proverb “give the fishing rod, not to the fish” so, helping poor people with financial aid is not the best solution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole What are advantages and disadvantages of this development 73
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life What are those problems Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns 78
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What are the changes occurring Do you think these changes are positive or negative 67
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...tries can help others by money, but not always. The main reason that poor countrie...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 817, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unplanned way" with adverb for "unplanned"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...roductive skills, so, children are born in an unplanned way, which makes a struggle mission for gov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19648093842 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7789386115 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557184750733 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.5007894624 49.4020404114 195% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.307692308 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2307692308 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41890595555 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167903969519 0.084324248473 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119124917785 0.0667982634062 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263288899049 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813532832917 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.