Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The poverty issue in many countries is a long-last problem that affects on the development of both the poor countries and the surrounding richer nations. Since providing financial aid does not solve that matter thoroughly, people start considering about other ways to support these lacking countries. Personally, I totally agree with this idea.
One of the reasons why financial aid is worthless is that the money does not provide jobs. It means that although people are able to pay for living expansion, they can not make a profit from the money they received. This problem is usually caused by lack of education and job opportunities. Therefore, instead of solely providing money, the government itself and other developed nations should improve citizen's education and create more job fields for poor people to boost their income.
The second idea is that promoting the economy of these indigent countries is a better option than only supplying money. Due to low-developing economy, residents of poor countries are unable to enrich more at that moment. Therefore, money given to poor countries without invested in improving their economy will become valueless. For instance, in most of developing countries, agriculture is the main economy. Should the goverment and wealthy countries encourage trading back and forth, agriculture in poor countries will develop actively and profit greatly. This example can apply to other economic sectors like manufacturing and tourism.
All things considered, developed countries can solve poverty more effectively in poor nations, if they aid these nations with job opportunies and promoting economy rather than supporting money obliviously.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only government and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The personal information of many individuals is held by large internet companies and organizations Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 71
- Some systems require students to specialize in a limited range of subjects from the age of fifteen Other systems require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of two education systems and what is better 82
- In many workplaces online communication is getting more common than meeting face to face Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The flow chart illustrates the consequence of deforestation Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52123552124 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79863926712 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590733590734 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8731204484 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.142857143 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78571428571 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346522751342 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113912316498 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853516843182 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21907125257 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734077692727 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.