For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some believe teachers are more important than parents in children's intellectual and social development, while others disagree. I disagree that parents have less influence on their children's social and cognitive development than teachers.
First, parents brought their children into this world and spend a lot of time with them, so they know exactly what intelligence they were born with. Parents who understand their child's inclinations will invest more in making them smarter. Also, parents know their child's personality and can choose a suitable environment for social communication development. For example, Thomas Edison was expelled from school as a child because his teachers underestimated him, but thanks to his mother's proper upbringing, he became a century's genius. Another reason is meals. Parents plan the child's meal, a nutritious meal that promotes physical and mental growth. Because parents' nutritional knowledge has improved, today's children are smarter and healthier than generations past.
However, teachers' positive impact on students' intellectual and social skills is undeniable. Teachers are trained to make children smarter and to help them communicate. Teachers assign group exercises to remind students of their knowledge, improved teamwork skills, communication and presentation skills. Nonetheless, parents must teach their children lifelong knowledge and social skills.
In conclusion, parents have a greater influence on their children's intelligence and competence than teachers. But they must work together for the children's overall development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-21 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
- Academic Writing Part 2 You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write at least 250 words Write about the following topic The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disag 73
- The education of young people is highly prioritized in many countries However educating adults who cannot write or read is even more important and governments should spend more money on this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- You are advised to spend about 20 minutes on this task The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the percentage of greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the info
- Some commentators feel that grandparents should live together with their children and grandchildren while others say that older people should be encouraged to live independently Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate and reach your o 56
- The graph below shows the number of complaints made about noise to Environmental Health authorities in the city of Newtown between 1980 and 1996 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nonetheless, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 41.998997996 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 226.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.04867256637 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93938889028 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632743362832 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4436015225 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1333333333 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0666666667 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.463510790289 0.244688304435 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153068337771 0.084324248473 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123888764265 0.0667982634062 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309518104579 0.151304729494 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789191276717 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.22 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nonetheless, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 41.998997996 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 226.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.04867256637 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93938889028 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632743362832 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4436015225 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1333333333 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0666666667 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.463510790289 0.244688304435 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153068337771 0.084324248473 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123888764265 0.0667982634062 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309518104579 0.151304729494 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789191276717 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.22 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.