Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the Internet, and they can study just as well at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the era of technology flourishing, schools are deemed not to be requisite for children, as they can self-teach and gain knowledge from the Internet. However, the writer possesses a reverse idea that schools will never be outdated due to several benefits to their development below.
First and foremost, schools provide accurate theories and practicing occasions, so that children can broaden their horizons and experience. Though having a mass amount of available information, lots of Internet resources are proved to be distorted and unconvincing. Young children, or even teenagers, are somehow incapable of selecting credible and prestigious sources to absorb knowledge. Moreover, self-studying at home with the aid of the Internet does not include any opportunity to practice, making learned things easier to be forgotten. On the flip side, schools’ lessons are carefully adopted and censored; ergo, eradicating the risk of students being taught incorrectly. Also, current curriculums in many educational institutions encompass a plethora of chances to practice so that children can apply what they have learned to reality and accumulate more hands-on experience.
The second advantage of schools making them unable to become obsolete is their essential role in supporting children’s overall development. Staying at home pursuing self-teaching does not bolster prerequisite social skills, including making friends and working in groups. Several studies have proven that home-study youngsters often find it arduous to work and get on with other peers who pursue their learning at education institutions. Furthermore, school students are believed to not only be more sociable than home students but more energetic and talented as well. A variety of clubs, campaigns, projects, and extracurricular activities inside and outside educational institutions proffer opportunities to attend exchange events. As a result, the attendees obtain practical knowledge about various aspects, which will be a distinct advantage for jobs application in the future.
To encapsulate, schools play a crucial role in providing proper knowledge and general development of their pupils. Albeit many benefits of information researching and self-studying, learning on the Internet may never replace the prominent position of schools in society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-13 | tteruchan65 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | wholemilk | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-30 | hellovenuss6899 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | ThanhHacker0306 | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | ThanhHacker0306 | 78 | view |
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the Internet and they can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years 78
- Young people who commit crimes should be treated the same way as adults To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- More and more people no longer read newspaper or watch TV programs to get news They get news about the world through the internet Is this a positive or negative development 89
- More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, may, moreover, second, so, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83625730994 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13650433616 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.8802388636 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.75 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217094312796 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650218611024 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479656224584 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12607180493 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443520820801 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.