Schools should focus on academic success and passing examinations. Skills such as cookery, dressmaking and woodwork should not be taught at school as it is better to learn these from family and friends.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Nowadays, schools are focusing in academic success and passing examinations but they do not really care about some sort of extra-curricular like cookery, dressmaking or woodwork. I do not agree with the statement because we need to have expert in some specials skill to teach us how to do it with the right way and professional. Schools should be teaching others skills not just academic success or doing essay.
Secondly, schools can make some activities or some class that help student study want they like and what they need. Take example about the woodwork class, some student that have creative mind can make products that helpful in life and explore new things, not just academic boring class. In addition, extra-curricular can help them make new friends and get more connection in school.
In the other hand, open class like woodwork or cookery class may needs a lot of money to spend on the facilities and professor, and not all the student want to study class like that and they will not enjoy it at all and will feel exhausted and tired after school.
To sum up, teaching skills like cookery, dressmaking or woodwork are have positive and negative effect. But I think the positive effect is more than the negative, they can make student have more skills in life and have time to do what they like, not just study boring academic lesson in schools. Especially after a long day in class and no exercise that help you improve your soul or your creativity mind.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-07-25 | sara5 | 56 | view |
2023-12-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | 56 | view |
2023-09-27 | thflinh | 78 | view |
2023-09-27 | thflinh | 78 | view |
2023-09-25 | quynhanh22 | 61 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentages of the UK workforce in five major industries in 1841 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 89
- In many countries, people in big cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 89
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 84
- The charts show the percentage of boys and girls aged 5-14 taking part in cultural activities and sports in Australia in 2003 61
- In many countries, people in big cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'specials'' or 'special's'?
Suggestion: specials'; special's
... because we need to have expert in some specials skill to teach us how to do it with the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ke cookery, dressmaking or woodwork are have positive and negative effect. But I thi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, i think, in addition, sort of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5099264676 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521568627451 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 373.5 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.1003766465 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.4 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222088002371 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106070221231 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868590246084 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141166581609 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110958694692 0.056905535591 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 78.4519038076 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.