Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The majority of scientific research today is conducted and controlled by governments or private companies in all parts of the world. However, there are some arguments about supporting scientific research by corporations. Personally, I believe research should be funded and supervised by the government.
On the one hand, scientific research is the key to finding a solution to society's problems. For example, the government needs to conduct medical research in order to develop vaccines against the Covid-virus. Moreover, research into renewable energies also plays a crucial role in dealing with global warming. These require so many processes that only the government can guarantee and pay for their investments and losses. On top of that, a team of experts who participate in scientific research controlled by the government will ensure the research process is safe and reliable. This can reduce the risk of scientific research being used for illegal activities. For instance, research into nuclear energy or weapons would be safer in neighbouring countries and would not affect the surroundings if it was carried out under government control.
On the other hand, if research remains in the hands of private corporations, it could be harmful or detrimental to the country. For example, research on weapons, atomic bombs, and chemical drugs should be carried out under strict management. Private organisations can't guarantee the study's safety because they don't have enough testing space. In addition, some private companies are profit-oriented and only think in terms of their own money. For example, they can sell their homemade weapons to gangsters, which can threaten a peace of nations.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government.
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 61
- More and more people want to buy clothes car and other products from well known brands What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Why is it the case Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic research controlled by the government will ensure the research process is safe...
^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...trict management. Private organisations cant guarantee the studys safety because the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...uarantee the studys safety because they dont have enough testing space. In addition,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01749997886 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567857142857 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0863949215 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.25 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339978201592 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119984612247 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867140985463 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253793095978 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652014037132 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.