Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?
Undoubtedly, scientific studies have played an essential role in human’s developments. Many people think that it must be governments’ responsibility for conducting and managing them, rather than private sectors. I totally agree with this opinion due to a few reasons.
Firstly, I suppose governments have to take the leading role in doing scientific projects because scientific activities often require long-term efforts, significant financial funds and the participation of hundreds or even thousands of researchers. As a result, the power and resources of the authorities enable them to conduct studies on a much larger scale and investment, compared to private firms. This is because authorities can finance more money and adopt other supportive measures, some of which are offering additional welfare and the positions in governments to the scientists, thus attracting more talents and experts to take part in the projects.
Secondly, I believe scientific researches controlled by authorities are more safe, advantageous and reliable. At first, governments will ensure doing ethical projects, which leads to minimizing the risk of these studies being used for criminal activities. For example, studies related to chemical, biological and nuclear weapons must be carried out and supervised by governmental organizations to prevent high-tech crimes and protect the country’s security. Furthermore, governments are people-driven and impartial. Consequently, they tend to pay more attention to research areas that can benefit society as a whole. Studies related to environmental issues or crime rates are great examples. In contrast, private companies are money-oriented. Therefore, they tend to invest in research projects that are more profitable. In addition, when the funding comes from a private organization, the results could be biased to ensure there is a favorable outcome for the funding institution.
In conclusion, although private companies should not be deprived of the right to do researches, I firmly believe that scientific studies must be conducted and monitored by governments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | ketan | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | trongduong96 | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | khietquynh2402 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Yui | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Habui | 61 | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- The bar charts below show the percentages of men and women in employment in three countries in 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The bar charts below show the percentages of men and women in employment in three countries in 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 76
- Many people say that the gap between rich and poor people is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer.What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems ? 78
- Essay Many people say that the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84838709677 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34326321863 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616129032258 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3488721249 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.3125 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278785535611 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076431437767 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054860952975 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164179139267 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418927720382 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.