Some children find learning history at school very exciting, but many others think it is very boring. In what ways can history be brought to life for all school children?
Most children think of boring lectures and lists of important dates to remember when they hear the words History class. This can be changed by a number of improvements to the class.
The best way to improve the history class would be to get students involved. Students often dread the thought of sitting for an hour listening to their teacher ramble on. This can be changed by getting them interacting with one another and having them become an active part of the lesson. For instance, it would be a good practice to assign roles of some historical events to each student and allow them to recreate the situations.
Another good way to improve the history class is to teach outside of the classroom. Students will therefore have an opportunity to leave the confinement of their desks and get a change of scenery. To incorporate history into a field trip, it is ideal to take the class to a historical village or even local buildings in the community such as a court house or library. This will make history more entertaining for the students and they will get to see it before their eyes.
Also it can be helpful if a history teacher is a good story teller. Although teaching the history class is not simply about storytelling, students generally find the lecture more interesting and easier to understand if their teacher tells better stories. By incorporating different elements into the lecture such as power point or even movie clips, teachers can make storytelling easier and more interactive.
In conclusion, the history class does not have to be tedious because there are many ways to make it a fun learning experience for students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-24 | ashiqulalamkhan | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | ashiqulalamkhan | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | ashiqulalamkhan | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | ashiqulalamkhan | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | ashiqulalamkhan | 67 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 73
- The diagram below shows part of the carbon cycle Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 62
- The flowchart below shows the process involved in completing the work experience requirement for university students Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The flowchart below shows the process involved in completing the work experience requirement for university students.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ll get to see it before their eyes. Also it can be helpful if a history teacher ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85815602837 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67963122835 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535460992908 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0363858597 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8571428571 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35714285714 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195859303368 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768741059392 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497723375512 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12503355193 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03509920221 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.