In some countries, criminal trials are shown on television for public. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
The issue of televising criminal trials for public viewing has sparked a debate regarding whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. While there are valid arguments on both sides, from my perspective, the benefits of televising these trials may be far more significant than the drawbacks.
On the one hand, there can be some minor disadvantages of televising criminal trials for the general public watching. One major concern is the potential infringement on the privacy and fair trial rights of defendants, witnesses, and jurors. In fact, the presence of cameras in the courtroom may cause individuals to feel intimidated or influenced, compromising their ability to participate fully in the proceedings. Another detrimental effect could be the risk of sensationalism and distortion by the media. By way of illustration, television networks may prioritize ratings and sensational aspects of the trial, potentially leading to a biased portrayal of the case.
Nevertheless, television broadcasting criminal trials on media platforms can have major advantages which overshadow these negative impacts. The most obvious benefit could be that it promotes transparency and accountability within the justice system. By allowing the general public to observe court proceedings, it ensures that the judiciary remains open and accessible to all. The second benefit worth mentioning is that televising criminal trials can provide an opportunity for the public to learn about legal procedures, the complexities of criminal cases, and the functioning of the justice system. As a result, this increases understanding can contribute to a more informed society and encourage civic engagement. Another positive impact could be that criminal trials in law courts, which are shown widely in the media, act as a deterrent to potential criminals. When the consequences of criminal behavior are broadcasted, it sends a powerful message to the public, discouraging them from engaging in unlawful activities.
To sum up, despite having some advert impacts, I definitely believe that allowing criminals to be showcased on television still holds significant benefits that somehow contribute to a fair and informed society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-24 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-01 | tata | 11 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | tata | 56 | view |
- Some countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world To what extent is this a positive or negative trend 61
- Some people say that parents shoud encourage thier children to take parts in organized group activities in thier free time others say that it s important for them to learn how occupay themselves on their own 73
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Many people think there is a general increase in anti social behavior and a leck of respect for others What do you think are the causes of this and how to improve it What solutions can you suggest 73
- Some countries are struggling with an increase in crime rates Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crime To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...s of televising criminal trials for the general public watching. One major concern is the pote...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...hin the justice system. By allowing the general public to observe court proceedings, it ensure...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, still, while, in fact, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68882175227 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21958006927 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580060422961 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2310469141 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.533333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353897445554 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111644527637 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119341902178 0.0667982634062 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20522083194 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066833433426 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.