In some countries, more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Some people believe that in certain countries, young people continue to live with their families even after finishing their studies and starting work. From my perspective, this trend has many benefits and I strongly believe that the advantages outweigh the drawbacks.
On one hand, there are several advantages to living with parents as a young adult. Firstly, it can save a lot of money. Young people who are just starting out in their careers may not have high salaries due to a lack of experience. Given the high cost of living these days, living with family can make life more comfortable and easier. Secondly, residing with family members can help forge stronger relationships between parents and their children. Living together provides opportunities for immediate conversations and more regular face-to-face interactions. For instance, during dinner time, young adults can share their work experiences with their parents, and receive mental support or advice from experienced elders.
On the other hand, living with parents can also have some disadvantages for those who don't learn to live independently. It can lead to over-reliance on family members. When living with family, people may become lazy and avoid doing housework, such as washing dishes or preparing meals. Moreover, the ability to make their own decisions may be affected. For example, in Vietnam, many parents are often involved in their children's decisions, which can directly harm their development of decision-making skills.
In conclusion, while there may be some disadvantages to young adults living with their parents, I believe that the benefits of this trend are more significant. By living with family, young people can save money and build stronger relationships with their parents. However, it is important to ensure that young adults learn to live independently and make their own decisions to avoid becoming overly reliant on their families.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | kphuong1901 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | TLan168 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
- The best way to solve world s environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Major cities in the world are growing fast as well as their problems What are the problems that young people living in those cities are facing Suggest some solutions 78
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 67
- PEOPLE THINK THAT SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES HAVE A HUGE NEGATIVE IMPACT ON BOTH INDIVIDUALS AND SOCIETY DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE 56
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think it is happening How to solve this issue 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...o have some disadvantages for those who dont learn to live independently. It can lea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40066225166 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83235711577 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546357615894 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2409158473 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9411764706 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64705882353 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35788662845 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121493252945 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840151031564 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238725766578 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342732801167 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.