In some countries people spend long hours at work. Why does this happen? Is it positive or negative development
Working long hours has increasing become a common habit in other countries worldwide. This essay will discuss the causes of this problem and this trend seen to have several negative effects with a large number of following reasons.
It pretty easy to understand why this is happening. Firstly, people perhaps have a high sense of responsibility at work. Depending on the career's features such as consulting jobs, management, staff sometimes tends to try completing all their work before coming home. Secondly, working long hours could be the norm in several countries. In most companies such as VietNam, Japan, etc, the staff needs to be work from 6 to 8 hours per day in most kinds of jobs. Thus, this has become an unsurprising thing to people.
This trend is leading to some negatively significant things for workers. Affecting directly to their health is one of the most disadvantages. If they are more likely to work over 8 hours per day or even above, they can suffer from a host of diseases related to both mental and physical issues, especially under pressure at the workplace. In addition, the staff is not capable to have enough time for working in relationships. Due to long working hours, it is quite difficult for them to take care of their family and meet their friends daily as well. Hence, good relationships can be lost easily if this situation lasts for a long time.
All in all, although there are some proper reasons for the problem spending too long hours at work, this still is able to affect negatively to workers' life with two above- mentioned impacts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-13 | vidung | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | phamkhuyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-27 | Fila | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | Sushmabenarji | 73 | view |
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen Is it positive or negative development 61
- WT2 The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction amongst many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 55
- Some people say that the government should spend more money taking care of elderly people while others think that government spending should be spent more on the education of young people Discuss and give an opinion 78
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 73
- Task 2 Some people say that government should spend more money taking care of elderly people while others think that government spending should be spent more on the education of young people Discuss and give opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...n to have several negative effects with a large number of following reasons. It pretty easy to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pretties'?
Suggestion: pretties
...arge number of following reasons. It pretty easy to understand why this is happenin...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84501845018 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62687089556 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623616236162 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4568904446 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333224098554 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103677844161 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650235946819 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207786836968 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320160729962 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.