In some countries people spend long hours at work. Why does this happen? Is it positive or negative development?
For several countries, people use great amount of time on doing their job because of the individual problems or their career. In my opinion, it is a negative trend that would lead to detrimental effects in the future.
To begin with, working with the utmost is the key for financial issues. This means if they spend more requiring hours at work instead of having a nine to five job, they may boost their income and no longer should worry about money. For example, in my country, the employees who already have a child need to get higher salary than others. In other words, in terms of the breadwinner, they must provide an adequate living standard for the whole family. On the other hand, the desire of hard work also comes from promotion. In order to avoid stuck in a rut, over-time job is the only way to demonstrate with the manager that they have passionate and distinct abilities to be accepted for new positions.
However, working a lot can lead to some significantly dangerous issues relating to mental health and physical as well. Obviously, working frequently can be stressful as it is scientifically proven. Take a recent report conducted in Japan, the possibility of adult suicide has been rising over years, following by an increase of anxiety in young people who still drive themselves to working habitant. In addition, serious health risks such as heartbreak, hernia and obesity may be found in over-time workers. Therefore, the longer they work per day, the higher possibility of suffering from negative implications.
In conclusion, I am convinced that extra time working promotes career aspiration and professional productivity, but this also causes unwanted problems for human being.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-13 | vidung | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | phamkhuyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-27 | Fila | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | Sushmabenarji | 73 | view |
- Do you believe that experimentation on animals for scientific purposes is justified Are there any alternatives to animal experimentation 89
- Some people think that famous people s support towards international aid organizations while others think that celebrities makes the problems less important Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 84
- Some people think that outdoor activities are more beneficial for children s development than playing computer games To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that studying history is a waste of time while others think that it is essential to learn Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 73
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen Is it positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'job' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'jobs'.
Suggestion: jobs
...t work instead of having a nine to five job, they may boost their income and no lon...
^^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uses unwanted problems for human being.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05300353357 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75437106288 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650176678445 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6441441233 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.142857143 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1428571429 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144377605054 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452432833093 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386276647599 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077529746487 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207752497773 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.