Some effective people like repetitive routine, such as eating the same food, do you like this way?
In this day and age of modern era, where we all devoting and contributing our efforts to get success, most of the time we ignore our lifestyle and routine it has been observed some effective people follow their timetable and habits for their activity like eating same food, the subject become a heated topic of discussion where as some communities advocates significant importance of such habit, other people disregards this phenomenon because of its pros and cons. This essay will discuss all the corresponding acquaints point in favor of liking or disliking by analyzing topic theme.
Firstly, routine has prominent impact on our lifestyle as we are chasing our day to day task which makes us overrule our need of food and diet. Applying define routine will assist us to achieve our goal. Most of the success people follow their diet chart to keep themselves active and healthy as they cannot accept any health issue. Following same food habit make their body comfortable to respond accordingly. Secondly their chart of food defined by expert which will provide ample amount of energy and power to keep running.
However, in averse other commodity does not like this approach because they believe limiting ourselves to define food and habit will not provide chance to explore other best thing in the world, if we become habitual of some kind of food it will reduce our body stamina and decrease capacity of body as there are many vitamin which can be absorb from different source. Moreover the prominent reason to not follow routine it will create a repeated lifestyle and which is somehow not good for everyone.
To conclude, after accumulating my thought based on the prominent and admirable points I would not be agree to follow same routine in term of food. Rest routines are good for individuals like workout in gym and so on.
- The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970’s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? 72
- There is no need for newspapers in modern world. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Recycling our waste is a big issue today. A lot of people feel that others are not recycling enough and that the government should make it a legal requirement. In your opinion, should laws be needed to ensure that people recycle their waste? 77
- Some people believe the large shopping malls are replacing local shops which is bad for local economies What is your opinion 84
- What are the pros and cons of staying connected on social media for 24 hours a day. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ect become a heated topic of discussion where as some communities advocates significant ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun vitamin seems to be countable; consider using: 'many vitamins'.
Suggestion: many vitamins
... decrease capacity of body as there are many vitamin which can be absorb from different sour...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ch can be absorb from different source. Moreover the prominent reason to not follow rout...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93247588424 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46196866123 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578778135048 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 123.194866803 49.4020404114 249% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 139.454545455 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2727272727 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206960116643 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716363780662 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667242085593 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130164969852 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762567477337 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.