Some feel executives in large companies should receive high salaries while others think they are paid too much compared to ordinary workers.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have different views on whether companies ought to be capped remuneration and wage at a certain level. Along with that, it seems sensible if people earn as much as companies tend to pay. Based on my knowledge, there should be a pay-gap between ordinary workers, professionals, and managers.
Accordingly, big companies such as Google, Tesla, NASA, Benz, and etc. owing to variety of responsibilities, they should be free to dedicate sum or remuneration to their executives or in the procedure of hiring professionals as much as they want. In fact, there is a huge difference between the responsibilities that ordinary workers, managers, and professionals are face with. For example, a professional in the Benz company is under a serious pressure of his outcomes or even the executives in the mentioned company will cost a lot if they do any kinds of mistakes in their tasks or maybe their mistakes resulted in a devastating impact to the company. In contrast, an ordinary worker may just find a certain cost in compensation of its failure in its task. Moreover, existence of a pay-gap between employees could rise a competitive atmosphere and works as a motivation for them. Hence, not only will they do their best to making more money but they also can be promoted to a higher grade.
Let’s consider and talk about another people, whom belief that the revenue of the ordinary workers and the others in the pivotal roles must be in a low band gap. In that case, there won’t remain any cogent reason to make professionals who are responsible for the progress of companies and also, barely can find someone who is volunteer to be a head manager which is full of tough and remarkable responsibilities. Eventually, without any reasonable prizes, or salaries that could perfectly justify the extra efforts, we won’t have a cheerful and motivated society and also, we won’t see noticeable progress in any sort of companies.
In conclusion, obviously, people in the position of executives and professionals are deserves to get more salary especially well-experience ones because they are carrying heavy responsibilities on their shoulders. But in order to make satisfy all types of employees, not only is it better to introduce a minimum and maximum level of wage but also ratcheting up in the minimum level of revenue would be great to meet their needs perfectly. In that case, we will witness of a dive-nose in the number of demotivated people and thriving economy.
- the bar chart shows the percentage of elderly citizens in three countries in 1980 2000 2030 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- 8 Some people believe that the experiences children have before they go to school will have the greatest effect on their future life Others argue that experiences gained when they are teenagers have a bigger influence Discuss both views and give your own 67
- Some think scientists should be allowed to send messages into space to communicate with other life forms while others believe this is too dangerous Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 78
- 8 Some people believe that the experiences children have before they go to school will have the greatest effect on their future life Others argue that experiences gained when they are teenagers have a bigger influence Discuss both views and give your own 77
- Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work rather than on university education 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 63, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...nies such as Google, Tesla, NASA, Benz, and etc. owing to variety of responsibilities, t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, sort of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2068.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 413.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00726392252 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07805615656 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542372881356 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.0297238908 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.25 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8125 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136005148959 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452070525339 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329550082565 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0790272942747 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350607837911 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.