Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
Many companies think that their workers should wear good clothes. Others however, give importance to quality of work than looks. A discussion of why dressing smartly is beneficial to the company but why quality work is more important than appearance and ultimately superior will be presented in this essay.
According to some of the companies, dress code plays an important role in their success. Dressing properly represents company's professionalism. Success is defined by how professional the company is. For instance, employees wearing good dresses can boost up their confidence in dealing with clients because of the feeling that they are a part of a professional organization.
On the contrary, others believe that quality of working is superior then appearances. Employees can perform more efficiently and up to the standards if they are comfortable in what they are wearing. Quality work is also not compromised in this scenario and is delivered with full focus and determination. For example, Giving power to the employees that they can wear whatever they want will eventually be in company's benefit because they will be able to perform significantly better and will be able to deliver the quality of work the company needs.
In conclusion, many organizations has the belief that their team should dress properly, while others give importance to the quality of work. Although, smart appearance can benefit some organizations, but others however believe that quality of work has vital importance then dressing because employees can perform better. In my opinion, companies should focus more on the quality of work rather then focusing on appearances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maria ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | dolle123 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 56 | view |
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 73
- The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in 1999 56
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages 61
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important Why might this be the case Is this a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... presented in this essay. According to some of the companies, dress code plays an importan...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 394, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...ocus more on the quality of work rather then focusing on appearances.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36398467433 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96509149775 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498084291188 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5982766581 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300733778033 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116548517911 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751091435464 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202927339603 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938022289609 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.